From: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
kinglongmee@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] NFSD: fix cannot umounting mount points under pseudo root
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:42:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5595078C.3050905@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150627093559.28f604c3@noble>
On 6/27/2015 07:35, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 07:14:00 +0800 Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> ping ....
>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >From d831154bb7e527f9003e16ac049526be5ed90228 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 16:24:16 +0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] mountd: Case-insensitive path length must equals to parent
>>>
>>> Commit 6091c0a4c4 (mountd: add support for case-insensitive file names)
>>> introduces looking up bad path which is easy to trigger a present mutex race.
>>>
>
> How do you know that every file system that treats multiple different
> strings as the same, imposes the rule that the strings must be the same
> length?
Agree with you.
With your suggestion, there is a bug exist.
static int is_subdirectory(char *child, char *parent)
{
/* Check is child is strictly a subdirectory of
* parent or a more distant descendant.
*/
size_t l = strlen(parent);
# rpc.mountd get parent's length.
if (strcmp(parent, "/") == 0 && child[1] != 0)
return 1;
return (same_path(child, parent, l) && child[l] == '/');
# will truncate child's name by parent's length, also checking child[l].
# I think the length should be calculated by the count of '/'.
}
>
> Given how complex unicode case rules can be, I certainly wouldn't be
> certain of that.
>
> If the only purpose of this patch is to avoid triggering a bug in a
> separate piece of code, then I am not in favour of it.
Yes,
This patch just change two condition's position.
Please ignore this patch,
maybe a new patch for NeilBrown's suggestion will be post.
thanks,
Kinglong Mee
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> utils/mountd/cache.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/utils/mountd/cache.c b/utils/mountd/cache.c
>>> index 7d250f9..155695a 100644
>>> --- a/utils/mountd/cache.c
>>> +++ b/utils/mountd/cache.c
>>> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int is_subdirectory(char *child, char *parent)
>>> if (strcmp(parent, "/") == 0 && child[1] != 0)
>>> return 1;
>>>
>>> - return (same_path(child, parent, l) && child[l] == '/');
>>> + return (child[l] == '/' && same_path(child, parent, l));
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int path_matches(nfs_export *exp, char *path)
>>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-02 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 14:50 [PATCH RFC] NFSD: fix cannot umounting mount points under pseudo root Kinglong Mee
2015-04-21 21:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-04-22 5:07 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-22 11:11 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-04-22 15:07 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-04-22 23:44 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-23 12:52 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-04-24 3:00 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-27 12:11 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-04-29 2:57 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-29 8:45 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-04-29 19:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-04-29 21:52 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-30 21:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-01 1:53 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-01 2:03 ` Al Viro
2015-05-01 2:23 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-01 2:29 ` Al Viro
2015-05-01 3:08 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-01 13:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-02 23:16 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-03 0:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-04 4:11 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-04 21:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 22:27 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-04 22:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 13:54 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-05-05 14:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 15:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 22:26 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-08 16:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-08 20:01 ` [PATCH] nfsd: don't hold i_mutex over userspace upcalls J. Bruce Fields
2015-06-03 15:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-07-05 11:27 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-07-06 18:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-08-18 19:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-11-12 21:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-07 15:31 ` [PATCH RFC] NFSD: fix cannot umounting mount points under pseudo root J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-07 22:42 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-08 14:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 3:53 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-05-05 4:19 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-05 8:32 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-05-05 13:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-06-26 23:14 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-06-26 23:35 ` NeilBrown
2015-07-02 9:42 ` Kinglong Mee [this message]
2015-05-01 1:55 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5595078C.3050905@gmail.com \
--to=kinglongmee@gmail.com \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).