linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>,
	"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/24] New fast registration API
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:15:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <560C42CE.6090000@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560C30F4.50900@sandisk.com>

On 09/30/2015 11:59 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 09/29/2015 01:58 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>> On 9/29/2015 10:03 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 09/17/2015 02:42 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>>> - Converted SRP initiator and RDS iwarp ULPs to the new API
>>> How has the converted SRP initiator driver been tested ? With the kernel
>>> tree that is available on branch reg_api.4
>>
>> That's odd. Although I haven't formally submitted reg_api.4 yet, I did
>> test ib_srp initiator against upstream srpt over CX3 (mlx4) and CX4
>> (mlx5). I ran connect, disconnect, stress IO of all block sizes and
>> some unaligned block-IO and SG_IO test utilities. It all seems to pass
>> for me.
>>
>> Just this morning (my morning) I tested the v2 set on iser, srp, nfs. I
>> placed that in branch reg_api.5. Would you mind running reg_api.5 and
>> see if this issue persist (I would be surprised because I haven't seen
>> any sign of it)?
>
> Sorry but I still see these messages with the reg_api.5 branch.
> [root@ib-ini linux-kernel]# git show HEAD | grep ^commit
> commit 3b5b34777d3cd606433f0aca51e3885323648e07
> [root@ib-ini linux-kernel]# uname -a
> Linux ib-ini 4.2.0-rc6-debug+ #1 SMP Wed Sep 30 11:38:36 PDT 2015 x86_64
> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> I will try to run a bisect.

(replying to my own e-mail)

Apparently this behavior got introduced through the patch "IB/srp: 
Convert to new registration API" (commit 
ad66cbace5ca8c60673bedf35e5027868b0dd2d7). Without that patch SRP I/O 
works fine. With that patch I see receive failures being reported. The 
SRP initiator was loaded on my setup with the following kernel driver 
options:

# cat /etc/modprobe.d/ib_srp.conf
options ib_srp cmd_sg_entries=255 prefer_fr=1 register_always=1

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-30 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-17  9:42 [PATCH v1 00/24] New fast registration API Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 01/24] IB/core: Introduce new " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 21:21   ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-24  7:37     ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-28 20:57       ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-29  5:59         ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-09-29  6:47           ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-29  6:49             ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-29  6:42         ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 02/24] IB/mlx5: Remove dead fmr code Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 21:24   ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 03/24] IB/mlx5: Support the new memory registration API Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 21:27   ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-24  7:39     ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 04/24] IB/mlx4: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 05/24] RDMA/ocrdma: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 06/24] RDMA/cxgb3: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 07/24] iw_cxgb4: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 08/24] IB/qib: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 09/24] RDMA/nes: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 10/24] IB/iser: Port to new fast " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 11/24] iser-target: Port to new memory " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 12/24] xprtrdma: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 13/24] svcrdma: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 14/24] RDS/IW: Convert " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 15/24] IB/srp: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 21:58   ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-24  9:06     ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 16/24] IB/mlx5: Remove old FRWR API support Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 17/24] IB/mlx4: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 18/24] RDMA/ocrdma: Remove old FRWR API Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 19/24] RDMA/cxgb3: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 20/24] iw_cxgb4: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 21/24] IB/qib: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 22/24] RDMA/nes: " Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 23/24] IB/hfi1: Remove Old fast registraion API support Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-17  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 24/24] IB/core: Remove old fast registration API Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-19 22:45 ` [PATCH v1 00/24] New " Christoph Hellwig
2015-09-24  6:53   ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-24 13:39     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-09-19 23:20 ` santosh.shilimkar
2015-09-20  9:36   ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-21 23:28     ` santosh.shilimkar
2015-09-22  7:19       ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22  7:56         ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-22 18:23           ` santosh shilimkar
2015-09-22 21:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-24  7:40   ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-29 19:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-29 20:58   ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-30  6:47     ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-30 18:59     ` Bart Van Assche
2015-09-30 20:15       ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2015-10-01  7:16         ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-01 17:53           ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-01 20:58             ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]               ` <35618B90-4D6E-4036-A69B-4405F020D440@dev.mellanox.co.il>
2015-10-02 15:37                 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-06  8:37                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-06 18:49                     ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-07  6:42                       ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-07 15:46                         ` Bart Van Assche
2015-10-07 15:48                           ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-07  9:20                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-07  9:25                       ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-07  9:36                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-07 10:00                           ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-07 16:30                       ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=560C42CE.6090000@sandisk.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).