From: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] svcrdma: Do not send XDR roundup bytes for a write chunk
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 19:14:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <566CE288.6000808@talpey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151207204231.12988.59287.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net>
Two small comments.
On 12/7/2015 12:42 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Minor optimization: when dealing with write chunk XDR roundup, do
> not post a Write WR for the zero bytes in the pad. Simply update
> the write segment in the RPC-over-RDMA header to reflect the extra
> pad bytes.
>
> The Reply chunk is also a write chunk, but the server does not use
> send_write_chunks() to send the Reply chunk. That's OK in this case:
> the server Upper Layer typically marshals the Reply chunk contents
> in a single contiguous buffer, without a separate tail for the XDR
> pad.
>
> The comments and the variable naming refer to "chunks" but what is
> really meant is "segments." The existing code sends only one
> xdr_write_chunk per RPC reply.
>
> The fix assumes this as well. When the XDR pad in the first write
> chunk is reached, the assumption is the Write list is complete and
> send_write_chunks() returns.
>
> That will remain a valid assumption until the server Upper Layer can
> support multiple bulk payload results per RPC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
> index 969a1ab..bad5eaa 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
> @@ -342,6 +342,13 @@ static int send_write_chunks(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt,
> arg_ch->rs_handle,
> arg_ch->rs_offset,
> write_len);
> +
> + /* Do not send XDR pad bytes */
It might be clearer to say "marshal" instead of "send".
> + if (chunk_no && write_len < 4) {
Why is it necessary to check for chunk_no == 0? It is not
possible for leading data to ever be padding, nor is a leading
data element ever less than 4 bytes long. Right?
Tom.
> + chunk_no++;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> chunk_off = 0;
> while (write_len) {
> ret = send_write(xprt, rqstp,
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-13 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-07 20:42 [PATCH v3 0/6] NFS/RDMA server patches for 4.5 Chuck Lever
2015-12-07 20:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] svcrdma: Do not send XDR roundup bytes for a write chunk Chuck Lever
2015-12-13 3:14 ` Tom Talpey [this message]
2015-12-13 19:44 ` Chuck Lever
2015-12-07 20:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] svcrdma: Improve allocation of struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt Chuck Lever
2015-12-07 20:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] svcrdma: Define maximum number of backchannel requests Chuck Lever
2015-12-07 20:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] svcrdma: Add infrastructure to send backwards direction RPC/RDMA calls Chuck Lever
2015-12-07 20:43 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] svcrdma: Add infrastructure to receive backwards direction RPC/RDMA replies Chuck Lever
2015-12-13 3:24 ` Tom Talpey
2015-12-13 20:27 ` Chuck Lever
2015-12-07 20:43 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] xprtrdma: Add class for RDMA backwards direction transport Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=566CE288.6000808@talpey.com \
--to=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox