From: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
kinglongmee@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs/blocklayout: make sure making a aligned read request
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:00:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D432D5.7000905@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160229095756.GA19397@infradead.org>
On 2/29/2016 17:57, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 09:51:31PM +0800, Kinglong Mee wrote:
>> Only treat write goes up to the inode size as aligned request,
>> because it always write PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, but read a dynamic size.
>
> Can you explain what the point is?
I run ltp tests with read02 hang.
There seams a loop in block codes.
It is caused by passing an unaligned read to bio.
So this patch is out as making a aligned read request.
> We'll never use data pas the block size
> in the page cache, but per the block size requirement in the spec we must
> be able to read it. This patch means we can't direct storage reads where
> we previously could, without any obvious upside.
bl_pg_init_read/bl_pg_test_read checks aligned base on SECTOR_SIZE.
bl_pg_init_write/bl_pg_test_write checks aligned base on PAGE_SIZE.
If according the codes, reads data per block size is okay.
But, there is a comment in bl_read_pagelist() as,
250 isect = (sector_t) (f_offset >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
251 /* Code assumes extents are page-aligned */
252 for (i = pg_index; i < header->page_array.npages; i++) {
253 if (extent_length <= 0) {
I don't known the meaning of "extents are page-aligned",
extent's start offset is aligned to page size?
or extent's start offset is aligned to page size and length
is equal to PAGE_SIZE too ?
thanks,
Kinglong Mee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-29 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-13 13:51 [PATCH] nfs/blocklayout: make sure making a aligned read request Kinglong Mee
2016-02-29 9:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-29 12:00 ` Kinglong Mee [this message]
2016-02-29 13:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-01 12:35 ` Kinglong Mee
2016-03-16 19:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2016-03-21 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-21 18:27 ` William Dauchy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D432D5.7000905@gmail.com \
--to=kinglongmee@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).