From: "Zhengbin (OSKernel)" <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
To: <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>, <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
<linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nfs: set invalid blocks after NFSv4 writes
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:10:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d7fbe2a-d365-2fdf-fe96-8f00d16795b5@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200521091721.105622-1-zhengbin13@huawei.com>
ping
On 2020/5/21 17:17, Zheng Bin wrote:
> Use the following command to test nfsv4(size of file1M is 1MB):
> mount -t nfs -o vers=4.0,actimeo=60 127.0.0.1/dir1 /mnt
> cp file1M /mnt
> du -h /mnt/file1M -->0 within 60s, then 1M
>
> When write is done(cp file1M /mnt), will call this:
> nfs_writeback_done
> nfs4_write_done
> nfs4_write_done_cb
> nfs_writeback_update_inode
> nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc_locked(change, ctime, mtime
> nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc_locked
> nfs_set_cache_invalid
> nfs_refresh_inode_locked
> nfs_update_inode
>
> nfsd write response contains change, ctime, mtime, the flag will be
> clear after nfs_update_inode. Howerver, write response does not contain
> space_used, previous open response contains space_used whose value is 0,
> so inode->i_blocks is still 0.
>
> nfs_getattr -->called by "du -h"
> do_update |= force_sync || nfs_attribute_cache_expired -->false in 60s
> cache_validity = READ_ONCE(NFS_I(inode)->cache_validity)
> do_update |= cache_validity & (NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR -->false
> if (do_update) {
> __nfs_revalidate_inode
> }
>
> Within 60s, does not send getattr request to nfsd, thus "du -h /mnt/file1M"
> is 0.
>
> Add a NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS flag, set it when nfsv4 write is done.
>
> Fixes: 16e143751727 ("NFS: More fine grained attribute tracking")
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Bin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
> ---
>
> v1->v2: add STATX_BLOCKS check in nfs_getattr
> v2->v3: need clear NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS flag first in nfs_update_inode
>
> fs/nfs/inode.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> include/linux/nfs_fs.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> index b9d0921cb4fe..0bf1f835de01 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> @@ -833,6 +833,8 @@ int nfs_getattr(const struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
> do_update |= cache_validity & NFS_INO_INVALID_ATIME;
> if (request_mask & (STATX_CTIME|STATX_MTIME))
> do_update |= cache_validity & NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE;
> + if (request_mask & STATX_BLOCKS)
> + do_update |= cache_validity & NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS;
> if (do_update) {
> /* Update the attribute cache */
> if (!(server->flags & NFS_MOUNT_NOAC))
> @@ -1764,7 +1766,8 @@ int nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc_locked(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fa
> status = nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked(inode, fattr,
> NFS_INO_INVALID_CHANGE
> | NFS_INO_INVALID_CTIME
> - | NFS_INO_INVALID_MTIME);
> + | NFS_INO_INVALID_MTIME
> + | NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS);
> return status;
> }
>
> @@ -1871,7 +1874,8 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> nfsi->cache_validity &= ~(NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR
> | NFS_INO_INVALID_ATIME
> | NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED
> - | NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE);
> + | NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE
> + | NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS);
>
> /* Do atomic weak cache consistency updates */
> nfs_wcc_update_inode(inode, fattr);
> @@ -2033,8 +2037,12 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> inode->i_blocks = nfs_calc_block_size(fattr->du.nfs3.used);
> } else if (fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_BLOCKS_USED)
> inode->i_blocks = fattr->du.nfs2.blocks;
> - else
> + else {
> + nfsi->cache_validity |= save_cache_validity &
> + (NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS
> + | NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED);
> cache_revalidated = false;
> + }
>
> /* Update attrtimeo value if we're out of the unstable period */
> if (attr_changed) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> index 73eda45f1cfd..6ee9119acc5d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ struct nfs4_copy_state {
> #define NFS_INO_INVALID_OTHER BIT(12) /* other attrs are invalid */
> #define NFS_INO_DATA_INVAL_DEFER \
> BIT(13) /* Deferred cache invalidation */
> +#define NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS BIT(14) /* cached blocks are invalid */
>
> #define NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR (NFS_INO_INVALID_CHANGE \
> | NFS_INO_INVALID_CTIME \
> --
> 2.26.0.106.g9fadedd
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-01 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-21 9:17 [PATCH v3] nfs: set invalid blocks after NFSv4 writes Zheng Bin
2020-06-01 7:10 ` Zhengbin (OSKernel) [this message]
2020-06-08 2:40 ` Zhengbin (OSKernel)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d7fbe2a-d365-2fdf-fe96-8f00d16795b5@huawei.com \
--to=zhengbin13@huawei.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).