From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] nfsd: perform all find_openstateowner_str calls in the one place.
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 07:46:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5de242d62709e11a18406981b189c0476b5da5ca.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304044304.3657-3-neilb@suse.de>
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 15:40 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> Currently find_openstateowner_str looks are done both in
> nfsd4_process_open1() and alloc_init_open_stateowner() - the latter
> possibly being a surprise based on its name.
>
> It would be easier to follow, and more conformant to common patterns, if
> the lookup was all in the one place.
>
> So replace alloc_init_open_stateowner() with
> find_or_alloc_open_stateowner() and use the latter in
> nfsd4_process_open1() without any calls to find_openstateowner_str().
>
> This means all finds are find_openstateowner_str_locked() and
> find_openstateowner_str() is no longer needed. So discard
> find_openstateowner_str() and rename find_openstateowner_str_locked() to
> find_openstateowner_str().
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 2f1e465628b1..690d0e697320 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ same_owner_str(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop, struct xdr_netobj *owner)
> }
>
> static struct nfs4_openowner *
> -find_openstateowner_str_locked(unsigned int hashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
> +find_openstateowner_str(unsigned int hashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
> struct nfs4_client *clp)
> {
> struct nfs4_stateowner *so;
> @@ -556,18 +556,6 @@ find_openstateowner_str_locked(unsigned int hashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static struct nfs4_openowner *
> -find_openstateowner_str(unsigned int hashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
> - struct nfs4_client *clp)
> -{
> - struct nfs4_openowner *oo;
> -
> - spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> - oo = find_openstateowner_str_locked(hashval, open, clp);
> - spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> - return oo;
> -}
> -
> static inline u32
> opaque_hashval(const void *ptr, int nbytes)
> {
> @@ -4588,34 +4576,46 @@ nfsd4_find_and_lock_existing_open(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfsd4_open *open)
> }
>
> static struct nfs4_openowner *
> -alloc_init_open_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
> - struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate)
> +find_or_alloc_open_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
> + struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate)
> {
> struct nfs4_client *clp = cstate->clp;
> - struct nfs4_openowner *oo, *ret;
> + struct nfs4_openowner *oo, *new = NULL;
>
> - oo = alloc_stateowner(openowner_slab, &open->op_owner, clp);
> - if (!oo)
> - return NULL;
> - oo->oo_owner.so_ops = &openowner_ops;
> - oo->oo_owner.so_is_open_owner = 1;
> - oo->oo_owner.so_seqid = open->op_seqid;
> - oo->oo_flags = 0;
> - if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
> - oo->oo_flags |= NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED;
> - oo->oo_time = 0;
> - oo->oo_last_closed_stid = NULL;
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&oo->oo_close_lru);
> - spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> - ret = find_openstateowner_str_locked(strhashval, open, clp);
> - if (ret == NULL) {
> - hash_openowner(oo, clp, strhashval);
> - ret = oo;
> - } else
> - nfs4_free_stateowner(&oo->oo_owner);
> + while (1) {
> + spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> + oo = find_openstateowner_str(strhashval, open, clp);
> + if (oo && !(oo->oo_flags & NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED)) {
> + /* Replace unconfirmed owners without checking for replay. */
> + release_openowner(oo);
> + oo = NULL;
> + }
> + if (oo) {
> + spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> + if (new)
> + nfs4_free_stateowner(&new->oo_owner);
> + return oo;
> + }
> + if (new) {
> + hash_openowner(new, clp, strhashval);
> + spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> + return new;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
>
> - spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> - return ret;
> + new = alloc_stateowner(openowner_slab, &open->op_owner, clp);
> + if (!new)
> + return NULL;
> + new->oo_owner.so_ops = &openowner_ops;
> + new->oo_owner.so_is_open_owner = 1;
> + new->oo_owner.so_seqid = open->op_seqid;
> + new->oo_flags = 0;
> + if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
> + new->oo_flags |= NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED;
> + new->oo_time = 0;
> + new->oo_last_closed_stid = NULL;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->oo_close_lru);
> + }
The while (1) makes the control flow a little weird here, but the logic
seems correct.
> }
>
> static struct nfs4_ol_stateid *
> @@ -5064,28 +5064,15 @@ nfsd4_process_open1(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> clp = cstate->clp;
>
> strhashval = ownerstr_hashval(&open->op_owner);
> - oo = find_openstateowner_str(strhashval, open, clp);
> + oo = find_or_alloc_open_stateowner(strhashval, open, cstate);
> open->op_openowner = oo;
> if (!oo)
> - goto new_owner;
> - if (!(oo->oo_flags & NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED)) {
> - /* Replace unconfirmed owners without checking for replay. */
> - release_openowner(oo);
> - open->op_openowner = NULL;
> - goto new_owner;
> - }
> + return nfserr_jukebox;
> nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay(cstate, &oo->oo_owner);
> status = nfsd4_check_seqid(cstate, &oo->oo_owner, open->op_seqid);
> if (status)
> return status;
> - goto alloc_stateid;
> -new_owner:
> - oo = alloc_init_open_stateowner(strhashval, open, cstate);
> - if (oo == NULL)
> - return nfserr_jukebox;
> - open->op_openowner = oo;
> - nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay(cstate, &oo->oo_owner);
> -alloc_stateid:
> +
> open->op_stp = nfs4_alloc_open_stateid(clp);
> if (!open->op_stp)
> return nfserr_jukebox;
Nice cleanup overall:
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-04 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-04 4:40 [PATCH 0/4 v2] nfsd: fix dadlock in move_to_close_lru() NeilBrown
2024-03-04 4:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] nfsd: move nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay() earlier in open handling NeilBrown
2024-03-04 12:42 ` Jeff Layton
2024-03-04 4:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] nfsd: perform all find_openstateowner_str calls in the one place NeilBrown
2024-03-04 12:46 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2024-03-04 21:41 ` NeilBrown
2024-03-04 23:04 ` Jeff Layton
2024-03-04 4:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] nfsd: replace rp_mutex to avoid deadlock in move_to_close_lru() NeilBrown
2024-03-04 12:50 ` Jeff Layton
2024-03-04 14:09 ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-04 21:45 ` NeilBrown
2024-03-04 22:03 ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-04 22:36 ` NeilBrown
2024-03-04 22:54 ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-04 23:04 ` NeilBrown
2024-03-04 23:11 ` Jeff Layton
2024-03-04 23:30 ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-05 0:05 ` NeilBrown
2024-03-05 0:11 ` Jeff Layton
2024-03-04 4:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] nfsd: drop st_mutex_mutex before calling move_to_close_lru() NeilBrown
2024-03-04 12:52 ` Jeff Layton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-04 22:45 [PATCH 0/4 v3] nfsd: fix deadlock in move_to_close_lru() NeilBrown
2024-03-04 22:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] nfsd: perform all find_openstateowner_str calls in the one place NeilBrown
2024-03-09 18:56 ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-10 22:13 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5de242d62709e11a18406981b189c0476b5da5ca.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=kolga@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).