From: "Philip Rowlands" <linux-nfs@dimebar.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Insecure hostname in nsm_make_temp_pathname
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 22:49:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6296a7d4-64de-4df0-893e-8895e8ec36d0@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
If a host dies after nsm_make_temp_pathname but before rename(temp, path) we may be left with paths resembling .../server.example.com.new
Some clever person has registered and installed a wildcard DNS record for *.com.new.
$ host server.example.com.new
server.example.com.new has address 104.21.68.132
server.example.com.new has address 172.67.195.202
You can see where this is going...
Our firewall scanners tripped on outbound access to this address, port 111, I assume due to NSM reboot notifications.
Suggested workarounds include:
* explicitly skip over paths matching the expect tempname pattern in nsm_load_dir()
* use a different tmp suffix than .new, e.g. one which won't work in DNS
Steps to reproduce:
# cat /var/lib/nfs/statd/sm/server.example.com.new
0100007f 000186b5 00000003 00000010 89ae3382e989d91800000000dc00ed000000ffff 1.2.3.4 my-client-name
# sm-notify -d -f -n
sm-notify: Version 2.7.1 starting
sm-notify: Retired record for mon_name server.example.com.new
sm-notify: Added host server.example.com.new to notify list
sm-notify: Initializing NSM state
sm-notify: Failed to open /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nsm_local_state: No such file or directory
sm-notify: Effective UID, GID: 29, 29
sm-notify: Sending PMAP_GETPORT for 100024, 1, udp
sm-notify: Added host server.example.com.new to notify list
sm-notify: Host server.example.com.new due in 2 seconds
sm-notify: Sending PMAP_GETPORT for 100024, 1, udp
# etc.
tcpdump shows the outbound traffic:
22:42:31.940208 IP 192.168.0.131.819 > 172.67.195.202.sunrpc: UDP, length 56
22:42:33.942440 IP 192.168.0.131.819 > 172.67.195.202.sunrpc: UDP, length 56
22:42:37.946903 IP 192.168.0.131.819 > 172.67.195.202.sunrpc: UDP, length 56
The client statd was artificially placed for the purposes of showing the problem, but I hope it's close enough to make sense.
Cheers,
Phil
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-11 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-11 22:49 Philip Rowlands [this message]
2024-11-12 14:01 ` Insecure hostname in nsm_make_temp_pathname Chuck Lever III
2024-11-12 14:27 ` Benjamin Coddington
2024-11-12 14:41 ` Chuck Lever
2024-11-12 14:59 ` Benjamin Coddington
2024-11-12 15:03 ` Chuck Lever III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6296a7d4-64de-4df0-893e-8895e8ec36d0@app.fastmail.com \
--to=linux-nfs@dimebar.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox