From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Minor NFSD global DRC clean-ups
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 07:38:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6542630e20d90e5cc32bfe3af1a3beb06575ef67.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717001232.438792-1-cel@kernel.org>
On Thu, 2026-07-16 at 20:12 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> I'm working on a series of global DRC improvements. A few minor
> clean-ups are ready for merge now.
>
> Chuck Lever (5):
> NFSD: Fix off-by-one in DRC bucket pruning limit
> NFSD: Eliminate percpu counter contention in DRC memory accounting
> NFSD: Eliminate percpu counter contention in reply cache statistics
> NFSD: Eliminate percpu counter contention in IO byte accounting
> NFSD: Document reply_cache_stats ABI
>
> .../ABI/testing/procfs-nfsd-reply_cache_stats | 38 +++++++++
> fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 2 +-
> fs/nfsd/stats.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/procfs-nfsd-reply_cache_stats
I had no idea that percpu counters could devolve into spinlocking in
certain conditions. Ick. I wonder if we need to do a pass over all of
our percpu counter usage for the same sort of thing. ISTM that we
pretty much always want to use the *_local versions for our use-cases.
In any case, for this series:
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 0:12 [PATCH 0/5] Minor NFSD global DRC clean-ups Chuck Lever
2026-07-17 0:12 ` [PATCH 1/5] NFSD: Fix off-by-one in DRC bucket pruning limit Chuck Lever
2026-07-17 0:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] NFSD: Eliminate percpu counter contention in DRC memory accounting Chuck Lever
2026-07-17 11:35 ` Jeff Layton
2026-07-17 0:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] NFSD: Eliminate percpu counter contention in reply cache statistics Chuck Lever
2026-07-17 0:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] NFSD: Eliminate percpu counter contention in IO byte accounting Chuck Lever
2026-07-17 0:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] NFSD: Document reply_cache_stats ABI Chuck Lever
2026-07-17 4:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] Minor NFSD global DRC clean-ups NeilBrown
2026-07-17 11:38 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6542630e20d90e5cc32bfe3af1a3beb06575ef67.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox