From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "osandov@osandov.com" <osandov@osandov.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"jlayton@kernel.org" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
"clm@fb.com" <clm@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSv4/pnfs: Reset the layout state after a layoutreturn
Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 13:48:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67c41c84df54b67c0dbbe01dc1076a4070eb5e82.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <956259d72ee10ad81fd49daa8f2daf12644dc50f.1746970063.git.trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Hi Jeff and Omar,
On Sun, 2025-05-11 at 09:28 -0400, trondmy@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
>
> If there are still layout segments in the layout plh_return_lsegs
> list
> after a layout return, we should be resetting the state to ensure
> they
> eventually get returned as well.
>
> Fixes: 68f744797edd ("pNFS: Do not free layout segments that are
> marked for return")
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index 10fdd065a61c..fc7c5fb10198 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -745,6 +745,14 @@ pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_invalid(struct
> pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
> return remaining;
> }
>
> +static void pnfs_reset_return_info(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
> +{
> + struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(lseg, &lo->plh_return_segs, pls_list)
> + pnfs_set_plh_return_info(lo, lseg->pls_range.iomode, 0);
> +}
> +
> static void
> pnfs_free_returned_lsegs(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
> struct list_head *free_me,
> @@ -1292,6 +1300,7 @@ void pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lsegs(struct
> pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
> pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_invalid(lo, &freeme, range, seq);
> pnfs_free_returned_lsegs(lo, &freeme, range, seq);
> pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, stateid, NULL, true);
> + pnfs_reset_return_info(lo);
> } else
> pnfs_mark_layout_stateid_invalid(lo, &freeme);
> out_unlock:
Could the above bug perhaps explain the issue with leaked layout
segments that you were seeing?
If the client doesn't set NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED, and the server
is unable to recall the layout due to the network getting shut down,
then it seems to me that these layout segments just disappear down a
black hole.
IOW: the scenario is something like this:
* The client holds a read and a read/write layout.
* The server recalls the read layout.
* The client closes the file while the recall is being processed, so
that the read and read/write layout segments are both put on the
plh_return_segs list.
* The client returns the read layout, and clears the associated read
layout segments. The read/write layout segments are still on the
list, but without NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED being set.
Cheers
Trond
--
Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-11 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-11 13:28 [PATCH] NFSv4/pnfs: Reset the layout state after a layoutreturn trondmy
2025-05-11 13:48 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2025-05-12 18:59 ` Jeff Layton
2025-05-13 0:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2025-05-13 15:21 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67c41c84df54b67c0dbbe01dc1076a4070eb5e82.camel@hammerspace.com \
--to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox