From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>,
Thomas Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSv4.2: fix setattr caching of TIME_[MODIFY|ACCESS]_SET when timestamps are delegated
Date: Tue, 06 May 2025 09:52:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6843f5bd39e7a9237c44c4b8e0099bb234b3a732.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f66fd307-c5d6-40b5-87b7-fc6450cc09f1@grimberg.me>
On Tue, 2025-05-06 at 16:43 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Hey Jeff,
>
> On 05/05/2025 16:23, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Fri, 2025-04-25 at 15:49 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > > nfs_setattr will flush all pending writes before updating a file time
> > > attributes. However when the client holds delegated timestamps, it can
> > > update its timestamps locally as it is the authority for the file
> > > times attributes. The client will later set the file attributes by
> > > adding a setattr to the delegreturn compound updating the server time
> > > attributes.
> > >
> > > Fix nfs_setattr to avoid flushing pending writes when the file time
> > > attributes are delegated and the mtime/atime are set to a fixed
> > > timestamp (ATTR_[MODIFY|ACCESS]_SET. Also, when sending the setattr
> > > procedure over the wire, we need to clear the correct attribute bits
> > > from the bitmask.
> > >
> > > I was able to measure a noticable speedup when measuring untar performance.
> > > Test: $ time tar xzf ~/dir.tgz
> > > Baseline: 1m13.072s
> > > Patched: 0m49.038s
> > >
> > > Which is more than 30% latency improvement.
> > >
> > (cc'ing Tom since he was the spec author for the timestamp delegation)
> >
> > Nice!
>
> Indeed,
>
> Do note that in order to get this change, I made nfsd send a space_limit
> (see under the
> '---' separator) such that file close will not flush buffered data if it
> amounts to less than
> the space_limit. Without this small patch, the flush invoked from close
> synchronizes everything
> and making setattr async does not buy us as much.
>
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
> > > ---
> > > Tested this on a vm in my laptop against chuck nfsd-testing which
> > > grants write delegs for write-only opens, plus another small modparam
> > > that also adds a space_limit to the delegation.
> > >
> > > fs/nfs/inode.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 8 ++++----
> > > 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> > > index 119e447758b9..6472b95bfd88 100644
> > > --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
> > > +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> > > @@ -633,6 +633,34 @@ nfs_fattr_fixup_delegated(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void nfs_set_timestamps_to_ts(struct inode *inode, struct iattr *attr)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned int cache_flags = 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_MTIME_SET) {
> > > + struct timespec64 ctime = inode_get_ctime(inode);
> > > + struct timespec64 mtime = inode_get_mtime(inode);
> > > + struct timespec64 now;
> > > + int updated = 0;
> > > +
> > > + now = inode_set_ctime_current(inode);
> > > + if (!timespec64_equal(&now, &ctime))
> > > + updated |= S_CTIME;
> > > +
> > > + inode_set_mtime_to_ts(inode, attr->ia_mtime);
> > > + if (!timespec64_equal(&now, &mtime))
> > > + updated |= S_MTIME;
> > > +
> > > + inode_maybe_inc_iversion(inode, updated);
> > > + cache_flags |= NFS_INO_INVALID_CTIME | NFS_INO_INVALID_MTIME;
> > > + }
> > > + if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_ATIME_SET) {
> > > + inode_set_atime_to_ts(inode, attr->ia_atime);
> > > + cache_flags |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATIME;
> > > + }
> > > + NFS_I(inode)->cache_validity &= ~cache_flags;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void nfs_update_timestamps(struct inode *inode, unsigned int ia_valid)
> > > {
> > > enum file_time_flags time_flags = 0;
> > > @@ -701,14 +729,27 @@ nfs_setattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry,
> > >
> > > if (nfs_have_delegated_mtime(inode) && attr->ia_valid & ATTR_MTIME) {
> > > spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> > > - nfs_update_timestamps(inode, attr->ia_valid);
> > > + if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_MTIME_SET) {
> > Is this also a bugfix? Is ATTR_MTIME_SET being handled correctly in the
> > existing code?
>
> I don't think so, the delegation holder is allowed to set attributes
> against the
> server if it so chooses.
>
> >
> > > + nfs_set_timestamps_to_ts(inode, attr);
> > > + attr->ia_valid &= ~(ATTR_MTIME|ATTR_MTIME_SET|
> > > + ATTR_ATIME|ATTR_ATIME_SET);
> > It might look a little cleaner to move the ia_valid changes into
> > nfs_set_timestamps_to_ts().
>
> I tried to stay consistent with the nfs_update_timestamps() call. But I can
> move it. sure.
>
> >
> >
> > > + } else {
> > > + nfs_update_timestamps(inode, attr->ia_valid);
> > > + attr->ia_valid &= ~(ATTR_MTIME|ATTR_ATIME);
> > > + }
> > > spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> > > - attr->ia_valid &= ~(ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_ATIME);
> > > } else if (nfs_have_delegated_atime(inode) &&
> > > attr->ia_valid & ATTR_ATIME &&
> > > !(attr->ia_valid & ATTR_MTIME)) {
> > > - nfs_update_delegated_atime(inode);
> > > - attr->ia_valid &= ~ATTR_ATIME;
> > > + if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_ATIME_SET) {
> > > + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> > > + nfs_set_timestamps_to_ts(inode, attr);
> > > + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> > > + attr->ia_valid &= ~(ATTR_ATIME|ATTR_ATIME_SET);
> > > + } else {
> > > + nfs_update_delegated_atime(inode);
> > > + attr->ia_valid &= ~ATTR_ATIME;
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Optimization: if the end result is no change, don't RPC */
> > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> > > index 970f28dbf253..c501a0d5da90 100644
> > > --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> > > +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> > > @@ -325,14 +325,14 @@ static void nfs4_bitmap_copy_adjust(__u32 *dst, const __u32 *src,
> > >
> > > if (nfs_have_delegated_mtime(inode)) {
> > > if (!(cache_validity & NFS_INO_INVALID_ATIME))
> > > - dst[1] &= ~FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_ACCESS;
> > > + dst[1] &= ~(FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_ACCESS|FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_ACCESS_SET);
> > > if (!(cache_validity & NFS_INO_INVALID_MTIME))
> > > - dst[1] &= ~FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_MODIFY;
> > > + dst[1] &= ~(FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_MODIFY|FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_MODIFY_SET);
> > > if (!(cache_validity & NFS_INO_INVALID_CTIME))
> > > - dst[1] &= ~FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_METADATA;
> > > + dst[1] &= ~(FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_METADATA|FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_MODIFY_SET);
> > > } else if (nfs_have_delegated_atime(inode)) {
> > > if (!(cache_validity & NFS_INO_INVALID_ATIME))
> > > - dst[1] &= ~FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_ACCESS;
> > > + dst[1] &= ~(FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_ACCESS|FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_ACCESS_SET);
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > FWIW, we've been chasing some problems with the git regression
> > testsuite when attribute delegation is enabled. It would be interesting
> > to test this patch to see if it changes that behavior.
>
> Can you elaborate? didn't notice that git uses the times ATTR_*_SET
> variant too often.
>
Unfortunately, not much.
If you turn on attribute delegation, and then run the git regression
suite in a highly-threaded configuration, some of the tests fail. I've
made a couple of stabs at trying to narrow down a the reproducer, but
no luck so far.
My guess is that it's a client-side bug:
The server is fairly simple here -- if there is an outstanding
delegation, it asks the delegation holder for attributes via CB_GETATTR
and then passes those along to the client.
The client however has traditionally relied on the server to provide
updated attributes, rather than handling timestamps itself, and it
wouldn't surprise me if it just didn't get all of those places right.
FWIW, I did try your patch with that test and it didn't help.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-25 12:49 [PATCH] NFSv4.2: fix setattr caching of TIME_[MODIFY|ACCESS]_SET when timestamps are delegated Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-04 6:45 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-05 13:23 ` Jeff Layton
2025-05-06 13:43 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-06 13:52 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-05-06 14:25 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-06 14:29 ` Jeff Layton
2025-05-05 13:25 ` Chuck Lever
2025-05-06 13:45 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-06 15:58 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6843f5bd39e7a9237c44c4b8e0099bb234b3a732.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loghyr@gmail.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox