Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sunrpc: Replace the rq_bvec array with dynamically-allocated memory
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 14:55:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f41906c28147e802bb2253cf1a9c86329b5a05e.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a0fc700-c0bc-42b3-b6c2-86a5ed171534@oracle.com>

On Wed, 2025-04-16 at 14:45 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On 4/16/25 2:42 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-04-16 at 11:28 -0400, cel@kernel.org wrote:
> > > From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> > > 
> > > As a step towards making NFSD's maximum rsize and wsize variable,
> > > replace the fixed-size rq_bvec[] array in struct svc_rqst with a
> > > chunk of dynamically-allocated memory.
> > > 
> > > On a system with 8-byte pointers and 4KB pages, pahole reports that
> > > the rq_bvec[] array is 4144 bytes. Replacing it with a single
> > > pointer reduces the size of struct svc_rqst to about 7500 bytes.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h | 2 +-
> > >  net/sunrpc/svc.c           | 6 ++++++
> > >  net/sunrpc/svcsock.c       | 7 +++----
> > >  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> > > index 74658cca0f38..225c385085c3 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> > > @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ struct svc_rqst {
> > >  
> > >  	struct folio_batch	rq_fbatch;
> > >  	struct kvec		rq_vec[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES]; /* generally useful.. */
> > > -	struct bio_vec		rq_bvec[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES];
> > > +	struct bio_vec		*rq_bvec;
> > 
> > It's a reasonable start.
> > 
> > What would also be good to do here is to replace the invocations of
> > RPCSVC_MAXPAGES that involve this array with a helper function that
> > returns the length of it.
> > 
> > For now it could just return RPCSVC_MAXPAGES, but eventually you could
> > add (e.g.) a rqstp->rq_bvec_len field and use that to indicate how many
> > entries there are in rq_bvec.
> 
> rq_vec, rq_pages, and rq_bvec all have the same entry count (plus or
> minus one) so only one new field is necessary. There are a few other
> places that allocate arrays of size RPCSVC_MAXPAGES that will need
> similar treatment.
>
> Stay tuned for v2.
> 

Ok. I think I didn't articulate this well. Let me try again:

If you're looking to break the assumption that the length of these
arrays is RPCSVC_MAXPAGES, then the thing to do is to eliminate the
places where we make that assumption.

In particular, the two places where you're adding new RPCSVC_MAXPAGES
invocations would be better replaced with a helper function that we can
change the return value of later.

> 
> > >  	__be32			rq_xid;		/* transmission id */
> > >  	u32			rq_prog;	/* program number */
> > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> > > index e7f9c295d13c..db29819716b8 100644
> > > --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> > > @@ -673,6 +673,7 @@ static void
> > >  svc_rqst_free(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > >  {
> > >  	folio_batch_release(&rqstp->rq_fbatch);
> > > +	kfree(rqstp->rq_bvec);
> > >  	svc_release_buffer(rqstp);
> > >  	if (rqstp->rq_scratch_page)
> > >  		put_page(rqstp->rq_scratch_page);
> > > @@ -711,6 +712,11 @@ svc_prepare_thread(struct svc_serv *serv, struct svc_pool *pool, int node)
> > >  	if (!svc_init_buffer(rqstp, serv->sv_max_mesg, node))
> > >  		goto out_enomem;
> > >  
> > > +	rqstp->rq_bvec = kcalloc_node(RPCSVC_MAXPAGES, sizeof(struct bio_vec),
> > > +				      GFP_KERNEL, node);
> > > +	if (!rqstp->rq_bvec)
> > > +		goto out_enomem;
> > > +
> > >  	rqstp->rq_err = -EAGAIN; /* No error yet */
> > >  
> > >  	serv->sv_nrthreads += 1;
> > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > > index 72e5a01df3d3..671640933f18 100644
> > > --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > > @@ -713,8 +713,7 @@ static int svc_udp_sendto(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > >  	if (svc_xprt_is_dead(xprt))
> > >  		goto out_notconn;
> > >  
> > > -	count = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec,
> > > -				ARRAY_SIZE(rqstp->rq_bvec), xdr);
> > > +	count = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec, RPCSVC_MAXPAGES, xdr);
> > >  
> > >  	iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, rqstp->rq_bvec,
> > >  		      count, rqstp->rq_res.len);
> > > @@ -1219,8 +1218,8 @@ static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> > >  	memcpy(buf, &marker, sizeof(marker));
> > >  	bvec_set_virt(rqstp->rq_bvec, buf, sizeof(marker));
> > >  
> > > -	count = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec + 1,
> > > -				ARRAY_SIZE(rqstp->rq_bvec) - 1, &rqstp->rq_res);
> > > +	count = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec + 1, RPCSVC_MAXPAGES,
> > > +				&rqstp->rq_res);
> > > 
>
> > >  
> > >  	iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, rqstp->rq_bvec,
> > >  		      1 + count, sizeof(marker) + rqstp->rq_res.len);
> > 
> 

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-16 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-16 15:28 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Move rq_vec[] and rq_bvec[] out of svc_rqst cel
2025-04-16 15:28 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] sunrpc: Replace the rq_bvec array with dynamically-allocated memory cel
2025-04-16 18:42   ` Jeff Layton
2025-04-16 18:45     ` Chuck Lever
2025-04-16 18:55       ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-04-16 15:28 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] sunrpc: Replace the rq_vec " cel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6f41906c28147e802bb2253cf1a9c86329b5a05e.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox