Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Steve Sears <sjs@hammerspace.com>,
	Thomas Haynes <loghyr@hammerspace.com>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-tls-handshake <kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: RPC-with-TLS client does not receive traffic
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 11:05:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7014c4fa-fa99-45d4-9c3b-8bf3ff3f7b38@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62cbd258-11df-4d76-9ab1-8e7b72f01ca4@suse.de>

On 5/15/25 11:02 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 5/15/25 16:44, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> Resending with linux-nfs and kernel-tls-handshake on Cc
>>
>>
>> On 5/15/25 10:35 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> Hi -
>>>
>>> I'm troubleshooting an issue where, after a successful handshake, the
>>> kernel TLS socket's data_ready callback is never invoked. I'm able to
>>> reproduce this 100% on an Atom-based system with a Realtek Ethernet
>>> device. But on many other systems, the problem is intermittent or not
>>> reproducible.
>>>
>>> The problem seems to be that strp->msg_ready is already set when
>>> tls_data_ready is called, and that prevents any further processing. I
>>> see that msg_ready is set when the handshake daemon sets the ktls
>>> security parameters, and is then never cleared.
>>>
>>> function:             tls_setsockopt
>>> function:                do_tls_setsockopt_conf
>>> function:                   tls_set_device_offload_rx
>>> function:                   tls_set_sw_offload
>>> function:                      init_prot_info
>>> function:                      tls_strp_init
>>> function:                   tls_sw_strparser_arm
>>> function:                   tls_strp_check_rcv
>>> function:                      tls_strp_read_sock
>>> function:                         tls_strp_load_anchor_with_queue
>>> function:                         tls_rx_msg_size
>>> function:                            tls_device_rx_resync_new_rec
>>> function:                         tls_rx_msg_ready
>>>
>>> For a working system (a VMware guest using a VMXNet device), setsockopt
>>> leaves msg_ready set to zero:
>>>
>>> function:             tls_setsockopt
>>> function:                do_tls_setsockopt_conf
>>> function:                   tls_set_device_offload_rx
>>> function:                   tls_set_sw_offload
>>> function:                      init_prot_info
>>> function:                      tls_strp_init
>>> function:                   tls_sw_strparser_arm
>>> function:                   tls_strp_check_rcv
>>>
>>> The first tls_data_ready call then handles the waiting ingress data as
>>> expected.
>>>
>>> Any advice is appreciated.
>>>
>>
> I _think_ you are expected to set the callbacks prior to do the tls
> handshake upcall (at least, that's what I'm doing).
> It's not that you can (nor should) receive anything on the socket
> while the handshake is active.
> If it fails you can always reset them to the original callbacks.

It looks to me like the socket callbacks are set up correctly. If I
apply a patch to remove the msg_ready optimization from tls_data_ready,
everything works as expected.

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_strp.c b/net/tls/tls_strp.c
index 77e33e1e340e..0440391dc476 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_strp.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_strp.c
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static int tls_strp_read_sock(struct tls_strparser
*strp)

 void tls_strp_check_rcv(struct tls_strparser *strp)
 {
-       if (unlikely(strp->stopped) || strp->msg_ready)
+       if (unlikely(strp->stopped))
                return;

        if (tls_strp_read_sock(strp) == -ENOMEM)


-- 
Chuck Lever

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-15 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <0288b61b-6a8e-409d-8e4c-3f482526cf46@oracle.com>
2025-05-15 14:44 ` RPC-with-TLS client does not receive traffic Chuck Lever
2025-05-15 15:02   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-15 15:05     ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2025-05-16 23:27       ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7014c4fa-fa99-45d4-9c3b-8bf3ff3f7b38@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loghyr@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=sjs@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox