Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
To: steved@redhat.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] mount.nfs: skip option validation on remount
Date: Wed,  6 Apr 2016 09:41:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <712798c489f69e39f235077f6ca85a7c133eeb58.1459949813.git.bcodding@redhat.com> (raw)

I'm not exactly sure this is the safest thing to do since you can pass
-oremount on the first mount and skip option validation.  Maybe someone with
better insight into the mount paths could comment.  Does mount need some
refactoring?  Its logic seems arcane.. and I think there is a lot of dead
code.

This is very quick attempt to fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313550

8<-------------------------------------------------------------------------

A remount might fail if name resolution returns a different server address
for the mount.  Since we've already validated the options the first time,
skip validation if remounting.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
---
 utils/mount/stropts.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/utils/mount/stropts.c b/utils/mount/stropts.c
index 86829a9..9383bb4 100644
--- a/utils/mount/stropts.c
+++ b/utils/mount/stropts.c
@@ -1090,15 +1090,15 @@ static const char *nfs_background_opttbl[] = {
 
 static int nfsmount_start(struct nfsmount_info *mi)
 {
-	if (!nfs_validate_options(mi))
-		return EX_FAIL;
-
 	/*
 	 * Avoid retry and negotiation logic when remounting
 	 */
 	if (mi->flags & MS_REMOUNT)
 		return nfs_remount(mi);
 
+	if (!nfs_validate_options(mi))
+		return EX_FAIL;
+
 	if (po_rightmost(mi->options, nfs_background_opttbl) == 0)
 		return nfsmount_bg(mi);
 	else
-- 
1.7.1


             reply	other threads:[~2016-04-06 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-06 13:41 Benjamin Coddington [this message]
2016-04-06 15:10 ` [RFC PATCH] mount.nfs: skip option validation on remount Chuck Lever
2016-04-06 15:24   ` Benjamin Coddington
2016-04-06 15:47     ` Chuck Lever
2016-04-06 15:58       ` Benjamin Coddington
2016-04-06 15:59       ` Chuck Lever
2016-04-06 16:07         ` Benjamin Coddington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=712798c489f69e39f235077f6ca85a7c133eeb58.1459949813.git.bcodding@redhat.com \
    --to=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steved@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox