From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] SUNRPC: Create a helper function for accessing the rpc_clnt's xprt_switch
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2023 07:24:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <79944d1c5e20173de5e3b818816a1c3ce172968a.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231201211549.126941-4-anna@kernel.org>
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:15 -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> From: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
>
> This function takes the necessary rcu read lock to dereference the
> client's rpc_xprt_switch and bump the reference count so it doesn't
> disappear underneath us before returning. This does mean that callers
> are responsible for calling xprt_switch_put() on the returned object
> when they are done with it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/clnt.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> index 8df944444e9b..0b2c4b5484f5 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> @@ -797,15 +797,24 @@ int rpc_switch_client_transport(struct rpc_clnt *clnt,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpc_switch_client_transport);
>
> +static struct rpc_xprt_switch *rpc_clnt_xprt_switch_get(struct rpc_clnt *clnt)
> +{
> + struct rpc_xprt_switch *xps;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + xps = xprt_switch_get(rcu_dereference(clnt->cl_xpi.xpi_xpswitch));
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + return xps;
> +}
> +
> static
> int _rpc_clnt_xprt_iter_init(struct rpc_clnt *clnt, struct rpc_xprt_iter *xpi,
> void func(struct rpc_xprt_iter *xpi, struct rpc_xprt_switch *xps))
> {
> struct rpc_xprt_switch *xps;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - xps = xprt_switch_get(rcu_dereference(clnt->cl_xpi.xpi_xpswitch));
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + xps = rpc_clnt_xprt_switch_get(clnt);
> if (xps == NULL)
> return -EAGAIN;
> func(xpi, xps);
> @@ -2206,9 +2215,7 @@ call_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task)
> struct rpc_xprt *saved = task->tk_xprt;
> struct rpc_xprt_switch *xps;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - xps = xprt_switch_get(rcu_dereference(clnt->cl_xpi.xpi_xpswitch));
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + xps = rpc_clnt_xprt_switch_get(clnt);
> if (xps->xps_nxprts > 1) {
> long value;
>
> @@ -3251,22 +3258,23 @@ void rpc_clnt_xprt_set_online(struct rpc_clnt *clnt, struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> {
> struct rpc_xprt_switch *xps;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - xps = rcu_dereference(clnt->cl_xpi.xpi_xpswitch);
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + xps = rpc_clnt_xprt_switch_get(clnt);
> xprt_set_online_locked(xprt, xps);
> + xprt_switch_put(xps);
> }
FWIW, it looks like the above fixes a real bug. It's almost certainly
not safe to dereference xps once you drop the rcu_read_lock there.
>
> void rpc_clnt_xprt_switch_add_xprt(struct rpc_clnt *clnt, struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> {
> + struct rpc_xprt_switch *xps;
> +
> if (rpc_clnt_xprt_switch_has_addr(clnt,
> (const struct sockaddr *)&xprt->addr)) {
> return rpc_clnt_xprt_set_online(clnt, xprt);
> }
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - rpc_xprt_switch_add_xprt(rcu_dereference(clnt->cl_xpi.xpi_xpswitch),
> - xprt);
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + xps = rpc_clnt_xprt_switch_get(clnt);
> + rpc_xprt_switch_add_xprt(xps, xprt);
> + xprt_switch_put(xps);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpc_clnt_xprt_switch_add_xprt);
>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-03 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-01 21:15 [PATCH 0/4] SUNRPC: Various RCU fixes Anna Schumaker
2023-12-01 21:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] SUNRPC: Clean up unused variable in rpc_xprt_probe_trunked() Anna Schumaker
2023-12-03 12:18 ` Jeff Layton
2023-12-01 21:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] SUNRPC: Remove unused function rpc_clnt_xprt_switch_put() Anna Schumaker
2023-12-03 12:19 ` Jeff Layton
2023-12-01 21:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] SUNRPC: Create a helper function for accessing the rpc_clnt's xprt_switch Anna Schumaker
2023-12-03 12:24 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-12-01 21:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] SUNRPC: Fix a suspicious RCU usage warning Anna Schumaker
2023-12-03 12:30 ` Jeff Layton
2023-12-04 17:00 ` Anna Schumaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=79944d1c5e20173de5e3b818816a1c3ce172968a.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox