linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
	Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] nfsd: perform all find_openstateowner_str calls in the one place.
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 18:04:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b60dc89044de2a973282cf76033940c24a6d814.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <170958848677.24797.14503972307018020397@noble.neil.brown.name>

On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 08:41 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2024, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 15:40 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > Currently find_openstateowner_str looks are done both in
> > > nfsd4_process_open1() and alloc_init_open_stateowner() - the latter
> > > possibly being a surprise based on its name.
> > > 
> > > It would be easier to follow, and more conformant to common patterns, if
> > > the lookup was all in the one place.
> > > 
> > > So replace alloc_init_open_stateowner() with
> > > find_or_alloc_open_stateowner() and use the latter in
> > > nfsd4_process_open1() without any calls to find_openstateowner_str().
> > > 
> > > This means all finds are find_openstateowner_str_locked() and
> > > find_openstateowner_str() is no longer needed.  So discard
> > > find_openstateowner_str() and rename find_openstateowner_str_locked() to
> > > find_openstateowner_str().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > > index 2f1e465628b1..690d0e697320 100644
> > > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > > @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ same_owner_str(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop, struct xdr_netobj *owner)
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static struct nfs4_openowner *
> > > -find_openstateowner_str_locked(unsigned int hashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
> > > +find_openstateowner_str(unsigned int hashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
> > >  			struct nfs4_client *clp)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct nfs4_stateowner *so;
> > > @@ -556,18 +556,6 @@ find_openstateowner_str_locked(unsigned int hashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
> > >  	return NULL;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static struct nfs4_openowner *
> > > -find_openstateowner_str(unsigned int hashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
> > > -			struct nfs4_client *clp)
> > > -{
> > > -	struct nfs4_openowner *oo;
> > > -
> > > -	spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> > > -	oo = find_openstateowner_str_locked(hashval, open, clp);
> > > -	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> > > -	return oo;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > >  static inline u32
> > >  opaque_hashval(const void *ptr, int nbytes)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -4588,34 +4576,46 @@ nfsd4_find_and_lock_existing_open(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfsd4_open *open)
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static struct nfs4_openowner *
> > > -alloc_init_open_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
> > > -			   struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate)
> > > +find_or_alloc_open_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
> > > +			      struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct nfs4_client *clp = cstate->clp;
> > > -	struct nfs4_openowner *oo, *ret;
> > > +	struct nfs4_openowner *oo, *new = NULL;
> > >  
> > > -	oo = alloc_stateowner(openowner_slab, &open->op_owner, clp);
> > > -	if (!oo)
> > > -		return NULL;
> > > -	oo->oo_owner.so_ops = &openowner_ops;
> > > -	oo->oo_owner.so_is_open_owner = 1;
> > > -	oo->oo_owner.so_seqid = open->op_seqid;
> > > -	oo->oo_flags = 0;
> > > -	if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
> > > -		oo->oo_flags |= NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED;
> > > -	oo->oo_time = 0;
> > > -	oo->oo_last_closed_stid = NULL;
> > > -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&oo->oo_close_lru);
> > > -	spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> > > -	ret = find_openstateowner_str_locked(strhashval, open, clp);
> > > -	if (ret == NULL) {
> > > -		hash_openowner(oo, clp, strhashval);
> > > -		ret = oo;
> > > -	} else
> > > -		nfs4_free_stateowner(&oo->oo_owner);
> > > +	while (1) {
> > > +		spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> > > +		oo = find_openstateowner_str(strhashval, open, clp);
> > > +		if (oo && !(oo->oo_flags & NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED)) {
> > > +			/* Replace unconfirmed owners without checking for replay. */
> > > +			release_openowner(oo);
> > > +			oo = NULL;
> > > +		}
> > > +		if (oo) {
> > > +			spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> > > +			if (new)
> > > +				nfs4_free_stateowner(&new->oo_owner);
> > > +			return oo;
> > > +		}
> > > +		if (new) {
> > > +			hash_openowner(new, clp, strhashval);
> > > +			spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> > > +			return new;
> > > +		}
> > > +		spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> > >  
> > > -	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> > > -	return ret;
> > > +		new = alloc_stateowner(openowner_slab, &open->op_owner, clp);
> > > +		if (!new)
> > > +			return NULL;
> > > +		new->oo_owner.so_ops = &openowner_ops;
> > > +		new->oo_owner.so_is_open_owner = 1;
> > > +		new->oo_owner.so_seqid = open->op_seqid;
> > > +		new->oo_flags = 0;
> > > +		if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
> > > +			new->oo_flags |= NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED;
> > > +		new->oo_time = 0;
> > > +		new->oo_last_closed_stid = NULL;
> > > +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->oo_close_lru);
> > > +	}
> > 
> > The while (1) makes the control flow a little weird here, but the logic
> > seems correct.
> 
> Would you prefer a goto?  That is more consistent with common patterns.
> I'll do that.
> 

Ok, that works. I don't have a strong preference either way, so whatever
you think is easiest on the eyes.

> > 
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static struct nfs4_ol_stateid *
> > > @@ -5064,28 +5064,15 @@ nfsd4_process_open1(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> > >  	clp = cstate->clp;
> > >  
> > >  	strhashval = ownerstr_hashval(&open->op_owner);
> > > -	oo = find_openstateowner_str(strhashval, open, clp);
> > > +	oo = find_or_alloc_open_stateowner(strhashval, open, cstate);
> > >  	open->op_openowner = oo;
> > >  	if (!oo)
> > > -		goto new_owner;
> > > -	if (!(oo->oo_flags & NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED)) {
> > > -		/* Replace unconfirmed owners without checking for replay. */
> > > -		release_openowner(oo);
> > > -		open->op_openowner = NULL;
> > > -		goto new_owner;
> > > -	}
> > > +		return nfserr_jukebox;
> > >  	nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay(cstate, &oo->oo_owner);
> > >  	status = nfsd4_check_seqid(cstate, &oo->oo_owner, open->op_seqid);
> > >  	if (status)
> > >  		return status;
> > > -	goto alloc_stateid;
> > > -new_owner:
> > > -	oo = alloc_init_open_stateowner(strhashval, open, cstate);
> > > -	if (oo == NULL)
> > > -		return nfserr_jukebox;
> > > -	open->op_openowner = oo;
> > > -	nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay(cstate, &oo->oo_owner);
> > > -alloc_stateid:
> > > +
> > >  	open->op_stp = nfs4_alloc_open_stateid(clp);
> > >  	if (!open->op_stp)
> > >  		return nfserr_jukebox;
> > 
> > Nice cleanup overall:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks.
> BTW I've moved this to the start of the series - but kept your SoB.
> That avoid having one patch add code that the next patch removes.
> 

Sounds good.
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-04 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-04  4:40 [PATCH 0/4 v2] nfsd: fix dadlock in move_to_close_lru() NeilBrown
2024-03-04  4:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] nfsd: move nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay() earlier in open handling NeilBrown
2024-03-04 12:42   ` Jeff Layton
2024-03-04  4:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] nfsd: perform all find_openstateowner_str calls in the one place NeilBrown
2024-03-04 12:46   ` Jeff Layton
2024-03-04 21:41     ` NeilBrown
2024-03-04 23:04       ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2024-03-04  4:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] nfsd: replace rp_mutex to avoid deadlock in move_to_close_lru() NeilBrown
2024-03-04 12:50   ` Jeff Layton
2024-03-04 14:09   ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-04 21:45     ` NeilBrown
2024-03-04 22:03       ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-04 22:36         ` NeilBrown
2024-03-04 22:54           ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-04 23:04             ` NeilBrown
2024-03-04 23:11             ` Jeff Layton
2024-03-04 23:30               ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-05  0:05                 ` NeilBrown
2024-03-05  0:11                 ` Jeff Layton
2024-03-04  4:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] nfsd: drop st_mutex_mutex before calling move_to_close_lru() NeilBrown
2024-03-04 12:52   ` Jeff Layton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-04 22:45 [PATCH 0/4 v3] nfsd: fix deadlock in move_to_close_lru() NeilBrown
2024-03-04 22:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] nfsd: perform all find_openstateowner_str calls in the one place NeilBrown
2024-03-09 18:56   ` Chuck Lever
2024-03-10 22:13     ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7b60dc89044de2a973282cf76033940c24a6d814.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=kolga@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).