From: "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@linuxbox.com>
To: nfsv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Cc: nfs-ganesha-devel <nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: back channel flags, CREATE_SESSION, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:21:48 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <800236997.158.1317856908314.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <767481161.156.1317856859691.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>
Hi,
There seem to be legitimate reasons for an (NFSv4.1) client and/or server to prefer a dedicated callback channel.
If a server wants this result, it seems from the language of 18.36.3 that it should indicate it by not setting CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_BACK_CHAN in csr_flags in the CREATE_SESSION response, presuming the flag is set in the corresponding csa_flags argument (it's not allowed to set it otherwise). The client may respond with BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION on a new channel, setting bctsa_dir to CDFC4_BACK.
Currently, the Linux and I believe also the CITI Windows client always propose channels in both directions. The Linux mainline Linux client doesn't know how to BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION, so trivially it won't negotiate any back channel if a server didn't agree to both directions today, either. I've experimentally implemented a "fallback" model in a Linux client and (partly in a) Ganesha server. I'd appreciate any feedback on the idea.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Benjamin
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
http://linuxbox.com
tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-05 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <767481161.156.1317856859691.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>
2011-10-05 23:21 ` Matt W. Benjamin [this message]
2011-10-06 3:28 ` [nfsv4] back channel flags, CREATE_SESSION, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION Trond Myklebust
2011-10-06 3:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-10-07 1:42 ` Rick Macklem
2011-10-07 1:49 ` Myklebust, Trond
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=800236997.158.1317856908314.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com \
--to=matt@linuxbox.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=nfsv4@ietf.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).