linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@linuxbox.com>
To: nfsv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Cc: nfs-ganesha-devel <nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: back channel flags, CREATE_SESSION, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:21:48 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <800236997.158.1317856908314.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <767481161.156.1317856859691.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>

Hi,

There seem to be legitimate reasons for an (NFSv4.1) client and/or server to prefer a dedicated callback channel.

If a server wants this result, it seems from the language of 18.36.3 that it should indicate it by not setting CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_BACK_CHAN in csr_flags in the CREATE_SESSION response, presuming the flag is set in the corresponding csa_flags argument (it's not allowed to set it otherwise).  The client may respond with BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION on a new channel, setting bctsa_dir to CDFC4_BACK.

Currently, the Linux and I believe also the CITI Windows client always propose channels in both directions.  The Linux mainline Linux client doesn't know how to BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION, so trivially it won't negotiate any back channel if a server didn't agree to both directions today, either.  I've experimentally implemented a "fallback" model in a Linux client and (partly in a) Ganesha server.  I'd appreciate any feedback on the idea.

Thanks,

Matt

-- 

Matt Benjamin

The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI  48104

http://linuxbox.com

tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309

       reply	other threads:[~2011-10-05 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <767481161.156.1317856859691.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>
2011-10-05 23:21 ` Matt W. Benjamin [this message]
2011-10-06  3:28   ` [nfsv4] back channel flags, CREATE_SESSION, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION Trond Myklebust
2011-10-06  3:44     ` Trond Myklebust
2011-10-07  1:42     ` Rick Macklem
2011-10-07  1:49       ` Myklebust, Trond

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=800236997.158.1317856908314.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com \
    --to=matt@linuxbox.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=nfsv4@ietf.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).