Re: [PATCH RFC 9/9] sunrpc: don't upgrade passive net reference in xs_create_sock

[Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>]

On Mon, 2025-03-17 at 17:00 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> With the move to having sunrpc client xprts not hold active
> references
> to the net namespace, there is no need to upgrade the socket's
> reference
> in xs_create_sock. Just keep the passive reference instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> index
> 83cc095846d356f24aed26e2f98525662a6cff1f..0c3d7552f772d6f8477a3aed8f0
> c513b62cdf589 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> @@ -1941,9 +1941,6 @@ static struct socket *xs_create_sock(struct
> rpc_xprt *xprt,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (protocol == IPPROTO_TCP)
> -		sk_net_refcnt_upgrade(sock->sk);
> -
>  	filp = sock_alloc_file(sock, O_NONBLOCK, NULL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(filp))
>  		return ERR_CAST(filp);
> 

Is this not going to reintroduce the bug described by
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/67b72aeb.050a0220.14d86d.0283.GAE@google.com/T/#u
?

As I understand it, the problem has nothing to do with whether or not
NFS or the RPC layer holds a reference to the net namespace, but rather
whether there are still packets in the socket queues at the time when
that net namespace is being freed.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com