Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
To: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Async client v4 mount results in unexpected number of extents on the server
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:28:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <85AA0B5B-64BF-4308-8730-D62AF68F23A2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cb74904-331a-5615-6453-6ce8948236a2@applied-asynchrony.com>

On 12 Apr 2025, at 8:36, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:

> On 2025-04-11 15:29, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
>> On 10 Apr 2025, at 8:55, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Does this behaviour seem familiar to anybody?
>>>
>>> I realize this is "not a bug" (all data is safe and sound etc.) but
>>> somehow it seems that various layers are not working together as one
>>> might expect. It's possible that my expectation is wrong. :)
>>
>> My first impression is that the writes are being processed out-of-order on
>> the server, so XFS is using a range of allocation sizes while growing the
>> file extents.
>
> Thanks for reading!
>
> Yes, that's true but not the cause of the re-ordering - the server just
> does what it's being told. The reordering has to come from the client in
> async mode.

There isn't any guarantee of write processing order for async writes, is
there?  I also don't think there's any practical impact.  So I'm wondering
what's the expectation of behavior and what problem you're trying to fix?

Ben


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-12 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10 12:55 Async client v4 mount results in unexpected number of extents on the server Holger Hoffstätte
2025-04-11 13:29 ` Benjamin Coddington
2025-04-12 12:36   ` Holger Hoffstätte
2025-04-12 17:28     ` Benjamin Coddington [this message]
2025-04-12 19:19       ` Holger Hoffstätte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=85AA0B5B-64BF-4308-8730-D62AF68F23A2@redhat.com \
    --to=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox