From: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
djeffery@redhat.com, loberman@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Add a helper to identify current workqueue
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 06:25:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8732DDAB-026F-49F8-9B10-8D25C4732CA9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aGygp-3mtsLxtGT3@slm.duckdns.org>
On 8 Jul 2025, at 0:37, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 02:46:03PM -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
>> Introduce a new helper current_workqueue() which returns the current task's
>> workqueue pointer or NULL if not a workqueue worker.
>>
>> This will allow the NFS client to recognize the case where writeback occurs
>> within the nfsiod workqueue or is being submitted directly. NFS would like
>> to change the GFP_ flags for memory allocation to avoid stalls or cycles in
>> memory pools based on which context writeback is occurring. In a following
>> patch, this helper detects the case rather than checking the PF_WQ_WORKER
>> flag which can be passed along from another workqueue worker.
>
> There's already current_work(). Wouldn't that be enough for identifying
> whether the current work item?
NFS submits different work items to the same workqueue, so comparing the
workqueue instead of the work items made more sense.
After discussion on patch 2 yesterday, I think we're going to try to fix
this in NFS using a different approach that won't need this helper now.
Thanks for the look Tejun.
Ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-08 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 18:46 [PATCH 0/2] Fix loopback mounted filesystems on NFS Benjamin Coddington
2025-07-07 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Add a helper to identify current workqueue Benjamin Coddington
2025-07-08 4:37 ` Tejun Heo
2025-07-08 10:25 ` Benjamin Coddington [this message]
2025-07-07 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] NFS: Improve nfsiod workqueue detection for allocation flags Benjamin Coddington
2025-07-07 19:25 ` Trond Myklebust
2025-07-07 20:12 ` Benjamin Coddington
2025-07-07 20:42 ` Trond Myklebust
2025-07-07 20:28 ` Laurence Oberman
2025-07-08 16:50 ` Laurence Oberman
2025-07-08 17:03 ` Benjamin Coddington
2025-07-08 17:09 ` Laurence Oberman
[not found] ` <F889E706-9B2B-48CA-B30E-60FB5EFE2578@redhat.com>
2025-07-09 14:36 ` [PATCH] NFS: Fixup allocation flags for nfsiod's __GFP_NORETRY Laurence Oberman
2025-07-07 19:15 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix loopback mounted filesystems on NFS Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8732DDAB-026F-49F8-9B10-8D25C4732CA9@redhat.com \
--to=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox