From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fs: hide another detail of delegation logic
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:43:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8760d5hol3.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170829214026.GI8822@parsley.fieldses.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2348 bytes --]
On Tue, Aug 29 2017, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:43:05PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 25 2017, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>
>> > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
>> >
>> > Pass around a new struct deleg_break_ctl instead of pointers to inode
>> > pointers; in a future patch I want to use this to pass a little more
>> > information from the nfs server to the lease code.
>>
>> The information you are passing from the nfs server to the lease code is
>> largely ignored by the lease code and is passed back to the nfs server,
>> in the sm_breaker_owns_lease call back.
>>
>> If try_break_deleg() passed the 'delegated_inode' pointer though to
>> __break_lease(), it could pass it through any_leases_conflict() and
>> leases_conflict() to the lm_breaker_owns_lease() callback.
>> Then container_of() could be used to access whatever other data nfsd had
>> stashed near the inode. The common code wouldn't need to know any of
>> the details.
>
> The new information that we need is some notion of "who" (really, which
> NFSv4 client) is doing the operation (unlink, whatever) that breaks the
> lease. We can't get that information from an inode pointer.
>
> I may just not understand your suggestion.
Probably I was too terse.
I'm suggesting that nfsd have a local "struct deleg_break_ctl" (or
whatever name you like) which contains a 'struct inode *delegated_inode'
plus whatever else is useful to nfsd.
Then nfsd/vfs.c, when it calls things like vfs_unlink(), passes
&dbc.delegated_inode
(where 'struct deleg_break_ctl dbc').
So the vfs codes doesn't know about 'struct deleg_break_ctl', it just
knows about the 'struct inode ** inodep' like it does now, though with the
understanding that "DELEG_NO_WAIT" in the **inodep means that same as
inodep==NULL.
The vfs passes this same 'struct **inode' to lm_breaker_owns_lease() and
the nfsd code uses
dbc = container_of(inodep, struct deleg_break_ctl, delegated_inode)
to get the dbc, and it can use the other fields however it likes.
Then instead of the rather task-specific name "lm_breaker_owns_lease" we
could have a more general name like "lm_lease_compatible" ... or
something. "lm_break_doesn't_see_this_lease_as_being_in_conflict" is a
bit long, and contains "'".
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-30 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-25 21:52 [PATCH 0/3] Eliminate delegation self-conflicts J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-25 21:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs: cleanup to hide some details of delegation logic J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-28 3:54 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-29 21:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-30 19:50 ` Jeff Layton
2017-08-31 21:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-31 23:13 ` Jeff Layton
2017-08-25 21:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs: hide another detail " J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-28 4:43 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-29 21:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-30 0:43 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-08-30 17:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-30 23:26 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-31 19:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-31 23:27 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-01 16:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-09-04 4:52 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-05 19:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-09-05 21:35 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-06 16:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-09-07 0:43 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-08 15:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-16 14:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-25 21:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfsd: clients don't need to break their own delegations J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-28 4:32 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-29 21:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-16 14:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-09-07 22:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-09-08 5:06 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-08 15:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-26 18:06 ` [PATCH 0/3] Eliminate delegation self-conflicts Chuck Lever
2017-08-29 21:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-29 23:39 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8760d5hol3.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).