From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSv4.1: nfs4_fl_prepare_ds must be careful about reporting success.
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:01:09 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8760nlfkkq.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lgxiwoxi.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1389 bytes --]
Ping?
No sign of this in linux-next, and no replies....
Thanks,
NeilBrown
On Fri, Oct 21 2016, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Various places assume that if nfs4_fl_prepare_ds() turns a non-NULL
> 'ds', then ds->ds_clp will also be non-NULL.
>
> This is not necessasrily true in the case when the process received a
> fatal signal while nfs4_pnfs_ds_connect is waiting in
> nfs4_wait_ds_connect(). In that case ->ds_clp may not be set, and the
> devid may not recently have been marked unavailable.
>
> So add a test for ->ds_clp == NULL and return NULL in that case.
>
> Fixes: c23266d532b4 ("NFS4.1 Fix data server connection race")
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayoutdev.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayoutdev.c b/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayoutdev.c
> index 4946ef40ba87..85ef38f9765f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayoutdev.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayoutdev.c
> @@ -283,7 +283,8 @@ nfs4_fl_prepare_ds(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg, u32 ds_idx)
> s->nfs_client->cl_rpcclient->cl_auth->au_flavor);
>
> out_test_devid:
> - if (filelayout_test_devid_unavailable(devid))
> + if (ret->ds_clp == NULL ||
> + filelayout_test_devid_unavailable(devid))
> ret = NULL;
> out:
> return ret;
> --
> 2.10.1
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 800 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-18 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-21 0:01 [PATCH] NFSv4.1: nfs4_fl_prepare_ds must be careful about reporting success NeilBrown
2016-11-18 5:01 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2016-11-18 14:32 ` Trond Myklebust
2016-11-18 17:34 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2016-11-19 6:33 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-22 20:32 ` Adamson, Andy
2016-11-23 17:37 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2016-12-19 0:19 ` [PATCH resend] " NeilBrown
2016-12-19 0:28 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8760nlfkkq.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=andros@netapp.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).