From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: "Wang\,
Alan 1. \(NSB - CN\/Hangzhou\)" <alan.1.wang@nokia-sbell.com>,
"linux-nfs\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] SUNRPC: cache: ignore timestamp written to 'flush' file.
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 12:15:06 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877ergqsmd.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180213210314.GA12201@fieldses.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3012 bytes --]
The interface for flushing the sunrpc auth cache was poorly
designed and has caused problems a number of times.
The design is that you write a timestamp, and all entries
created before that time are discarded.
The most obvious problem is that this is not what people
actually want. They want to just flush the whole cache.
The 1-second granularity can be a problem, as can the use
of wall-clock time.
A current problem is that code will write the current time to
this file - expecting it to clear everything - and if the
seconds number ticks over before this timestamp is checked,
the test "then >= now" fails, and a full flush isn't forced.
So lets just drop the subtleties and always flush the whole
cache. The worst this could do is impose an extra cost
refilling it, but that would require someone to be using
non-standard tools.
We still report an error if the string written is not a number,
but we cause any valid number to flush the whole cache.
Reported-by: "Wang, Alan 1. (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)" <alan.1.wang@nokia-sbell.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
net/sunrpc/cache.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
index 8a7e1c774f9c..26582e27be6a 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -1450,8 +1450,8 @@ static ssize_t write_flush(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
struct cache_detail *cd)
{
char tbuf[20];
- char *bp, *ep;
- time_t then, now;
+ char *ep;
+ time_t now;
if (*ppos || count > sizeof(tbuf)-1)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1461,24 +1461,24 @@ static ssize_t write_flush(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
simple_strtoul(tbuf, &ep, 0);
if (*ep && *ep != '\n')
return -EINVAL;
+ /* Note that while we check that 'buf' holds a valid number,
+ * we always ignore the value and just flush everything.
+ * Making use of the number leads to races.
+ */
- bp = tbuf;
- then = get_expiry(&bp);
now = seconds_since_boot();
- cd->nextcheck = now;
- /* Can only set flush_time to 1 second beyond "now", or
- * possibly 1 second beyond flushtime. This is because
- * flush_time never goes backwards so it mustn't get too far
- * ahead of time.
+ /* Always flush everything, so behave like cache_purge()
+ * Do this by advancing flush_time to the current time,
+ * or by one second if it has already reached the current time.
+ * Newly added cache entries will always have ->last_refresh greater
+ * that ->flush_time, so they don't get flushed prematurely.
*/
- if (then >= now) {
- /* Want to flush everything, so behave like cache_purge() */
- if (cd->flush_time >= now)
- now = cd->flush_time + 1;
- then = now;
- }
- cd->flush_time = then;
+ if (cd->flush_time >= now)
+ now = cd->flush_time + 1;
+
+ cd->flush_time = now;
+ cd->nextcheck = now;
cache_flush();
*ppos += count;
--
2.14.0.rc0.dirty
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-14 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-11 6:55 A special case in write_flush which cause the umount busy Wang, Alan 1. (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
2018-02-13 19:57 ` NeilBrown
2018-02-13 21:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-02-14 1:15 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2018-02-22 0:46 ` [PATCH] SUNRPC: cache: ignore timestamp written to 'flush' file J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877ergqsmd.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=alan.1.wang@nokia-sbell.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).