From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@gmail.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Handling of duplicate inode numbers for the directories in the nfs v3 kernel client
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 09:45:32 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878t0uuzxv.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOiN93mX240ijc8mcX1OSKrQaP12At9t5c9cE3-T0gEuLC9RkA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1492 bytes --]
On Thu, Dec 13 2018, Ashish Sangwan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our NFS filer can sometimes return same inode number for different directories.
Why?
> For example /mnt/dir1/dir2 and /mnt/dir3/dir4, in same rare cases dir2
> and dir4 might end up returning the same inode number to the client.
> Though it can never happen that inode numbers will be same for two
> directories and also there parent is same. Can linux client handle
> this case? What issues it can cause?
As long as the file handles are different, the Linux client won't really
notice.
Problems might occur with applications which check inode numbers.
I don't know of any that would be confused by directories having the
same inode number, but that doesn't mean there aren't any.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/2/346
This is ancient! It is mostly about the NFS server, not the client.
Filesystems that NFSd is exporting need to be careful to provide unique
file handles.
> I stumbled upon this thread where it is written that nfs client can
> handle this but userspace will see inode collisions. Given that this
> will happen only for directories, userspace utils logic might not get
> affected from this as hardlinks on directories are not possible. But
> the thread is really old. Wanted to confirm if this holds true even
> now.
I don't think anything important has changed. The server must return
unquie filehandles. It should return unique inode numbers. User-space
may or may not get confused if it doesn't.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-12 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-12 18:57 Handling of duplicate inode numbers for the directories in the nfs v3 kernel client Ashish Sangwan
2018-12-12 22:45 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2018-12-13 3:47 ` Ashish Sangwan
2018-12-13 3:55 ` NeilBrown
2019-01-10 20:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-01-26 8:39 ` Ashish Sangwan
2018-12-13 16:26 ` Frank Filz
2018-12-14 5:11 ` Ashish Sangwan
2018-12-17 11:06 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878t0uuzxv.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=ashishsangwan2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox