linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: "Patrick J. LoPresti" <lopresti@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Use hi-res clock for file timestamps
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:54:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87aaolwar8.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimnyXKahtjaFeSsgcq=xMy-pP3na1jidQhZ-dt2@mail.gmail.com> (Patrick J. LoPresti's message of "Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:25:49 -0700")

"Patrick J. LoPresti" <lopresti@gmail.com> writes:

>
> 1) Anybody who cares about file system performance is already using
> "noatime" or "relatime", which mitigates the hit greatly.

Consider mtime.

> If the above patch is too slow for some architectures, how about
> making it a configuration option?  Call it "CONFIG_1980S_FILE_TICK",
> have it default to YES on the architectures that care and NO on
> anything remotely modern and sane.
>
> OK that's my proposal.  Bash away.

I suspect it will be a performance disaster on x86 for VFS intensive
applications on capable file systems. VFS is very performance
critical. These checks lurk on unexpected places too, e.g. on /dev
access.

Even TSC is much slower than just reading the variable.

Also you should check if the file system granuality 
even supports it, it's completely wasted on a ext3 for example.

Maybe as a optional sysctl, default to off.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-17 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-13 18:25 Proposal: Use hi-res clock for file timestamps Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-13 18:45 ` john stultz
2010-08-13 18:57   ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-13 19:09     ` john stultz
2010-08-13 20:53       ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-14 16:45         ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-15  1:50         ` Bret Towe
2010-08-13 19:57     ` Jim Rees
2010-08-13 20:26       ` john stultz
2010-08-13 20:52         ` Jim Rees
2010-08-17 14:54 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2010-08-17 17:41   ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-17 18:29     ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-17 18:50       ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-17 19:04       ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-17 19:18         ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-17 19:39           ` Alan Cox
2010-08-17 19:29             ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-17 19:52               ` Alan Cox
2010-08-18  5:53               ` Neil Brown
2010-08-18 14:46                 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-18 17:32                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-18 18:15                   ` Chuck Lever
2010-08-18 23:41                     ` Neil Brown
2010-08-19  0:52                       ` Neil Brown
2010-08-19  2:08                         ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-19  2:44                           ` Neil Brown
2010-08-19 22:46                             ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-18 23:47                   ` Neil Brown
2010-08-18 17:50                 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-18 18:54                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-18 19:25                     ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-18 19:30                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-17 19:34             ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-17 19:54               ` Alan Cox
2010-08-17 19:43                 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-17 19:45                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-18 18:12               ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-19  1:41                 ` john stultz
2010-08-19  2:31                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-19  3:17                     ` john stultz
2010-08-19 22:53                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-18 18:20       ` David Woodhouse
2010-08-18 18:32         ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-18 18:53         ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87aaolwar8.fsf@basil.nowhere.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lopresti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).