From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Benjamin Coddington <ben.coddington@hammerspace.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan Curley <jcurley@purestorage.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] NFS: size the LAYOUTGET reply buffer for wide flexfiles layouts
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 11:39:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bd83fcbd5622579460411db8862b7e5fcbc076.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1786653456.git.bcodding@hammerspace.com>
On Thu, 2026-08-13 at 16:41 -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> The flexfiles layout driver caps its LAYOUTGET reply buffer at a single
> page, which limits a striped layout segment to roughly 28 ff_data_server4
> entries -- far below the 4096-stripe decode limit the client otherwise
> advertises. A server striping wider than that has no way to hand the
> client a layout: it returns NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL, the client falls back to
> I/O through the MDS, and pNFS never engages for those files.
>
> This series first makes the client behave sanely when a layout does not
> fit the size it advertised in loga_maxcount, and then lets the reply
> buffer grow on demand up to the session's maximum response size.
>
> Patch 1 is a standalone fix (Cc: stable). A server's NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL
> is mapped to -ETOOSMALL at decode and then handled nowhere, so the
> client falls back to the MDS for that one request and re-sends a doomed
> LAYOUTGET on every subsequent pageio attempt. Suspend pNFS via the
> layout fail bit instead, the way NFS4ERR_LAYOUTUNAVAILABLE already does.
>
> Patches 2-5 make wide layouts work. loga_maxcount is derived from the
> reply buffer actually allocated rather than a fixed 4096 (block and SCSI
> layouts were advertising 4KB against a session-sized buffer, so a server
> whose extent list encodes larger than a page got a needless TOOSMALL).
> A TOOSMALL LAYOUTGET is then retried once with the buffer raised to the
> session's maximum response size -- the same bound GETDEVICEINFO already
> uses -- and a non-conformant server that ignores loga_maxcount and
> overruns the buffer outright takes that same recovery path instead of
> today's -EINVAL. Finally the escalated size is remembered per-server, so
> subsequent opens skip the attempt that is known to fail; this is also
> what lets the LAYOUTGET attached to OPEN succeed against a wide-striping
> server, since that path is best-effort and has no retry of its own.
>
> The common path is unchanged throughout: the first LAYOUTGET for a
> layout still goes out with the layout driver's default reply buffer, and
> larger buffers are only ever allocated against servers that actually
> hand out wide layouts.
>
> Patch 6 moves the decoded per-mirror stripe array to kvzalloc_objs(), so
> that a wide stripe array does not depend on a high-order allocation
> succeeding.
>
> Wire-validated against reffs at stripe widths 2 and 64, exercising both
> the conformant NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL path and the buffer-overrun path.
>
> Two known gaps are deliberately left for follow-up work:
>
> - The decoded per-stripe footprint is heavy: nfs4_ff_layout_ds_stripe
> is roughly 300 bytes and embeds localio and layoutstats state that
> most stripes never use. Both the structure and its array container
> want rework before very large stripe counts are comfortable.
>
> - The client decodes only the first logr_layout entry of a LAYOUTGET
> reply and silently discards the rest, so it can accept less coverage
> than it asked for in loga_minlength, and cannot amortize a
> multi-segment reply.
>
> A related series, "NFS: flexfiles device notifications and caching for
> wide striped layouts", handles CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID and scales the device
> caches for the layouts this one makes fetchable. The two are
> independent and apply cleanly in either order.
>
> Benjamin Coddington (6):
> NFSv4.1/pnfs: suspend pNFS on NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL from LAYOUTGET
> NFSv4.1/pnfs: derive loga_maxcount from the LAYOUTGET reply buffer
> NFSv4.1/pnfs: retry LAYOUTGET with a larger reply buffer on
> NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL
> NFSv4.1/pnfs: treat an oversized LAYOUTGET reply as -EMSGSIZE
> NFSv4.1/pnfs: remember when a server needs a larger LAYOUTGET reply
> buffer
> NFSv4/flexfiles: allocate the per-mirror stripe array with
> kvzalloc_objs
>
> fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c | 6 +--
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 9 +++++
> fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c | 2 +-
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h | 4 ++
> 5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> base-commit: db2ddb87143519e20a95aa36c60b36107b736a58
Aside from my minor comment nit, this looks good.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 20:41 [PATCH 0/6] NFS: size the LAYOUTGET reply buffer for wide flexfiles layouts Benjamin Coddington
2026-08-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: suspend pNFS on NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL from LAYOUTGET Benjamin Coddington
2026-08-14 14:19 ` Jeff Layton
2026-08-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: derive loga_maxcount from the LAYOUTGET reply buffer Benjamin Coddington
2026-08-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: retry LAYOUTGET with a larger reply buffer on NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL Benjamin Coddington
2026-08-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: treat an oversized LAYOUTGET reply as -EMSGSIZE Benjamin Coddington
2026-08-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: remember when a server needs a larger LAYOUTGET reply buffer Benjamin Coddington
2026-08-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] NFSv4/flexfiles: allocate the per-mirror stripe array with kvzalloc_objs Benjamin Coddington
2026-08-14 15:39 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bd83fcbd5622579460411db8862b7e5fcbc076.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=ben.coddington@hammerspace.com \
--cc=jcurley@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox