linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unix-domain sockets hanging on 3.14.x (was Re: possible 3.14.1 lockd problem (?) causing nfsd hangs)
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:55:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ha5dp9l4.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140428154648.GA31788@order.stressinduktion.org> (Hannes Frederic Sowa's message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:46:48 +0200")

On 28 Apr 2014, Hannes Frederic Sowa uttered the following:

> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 04:35:38PM +0100, Nix wrote:
>> /proc/$pid/stack of the two communicating ssh daemons was instructive:
>> 
>> [<ffffffff814e3512>] unix_wait_for_peer+0x9f/0xbc
>> [<ffffffff814e5d48>] unix_dgram_sendmsg+0x41b/0x534
>
> This one is a dgram socket...
>
>> [<ffffffff8146618f>] sock_sendmsg+0x84/0x9e
>> [<ffffffff81467f3d>] SyS_sendto+0x10e/0x13f
>> [<ffffffff815770e2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>> spindle:/var/log.real/by-facility# cat /proc/5941/stack
>> [<ffffffff814e493a>] unix_stream_recvmsg+0x289/0x6d5
>
> ...and that's a stream receiver.
>
>> [<ffffffff814673e0>] sock_aio_read.part.12+0xf0/0xff
>> [<ffffffff8146740b>] sock_aio_read+0x1c/0x28
>> [<ffffffff811388fd>] do_sync_read+0x59/0x78
>> [<ffffffff81138d8b>] vfs_read+0xa2/0x13f
>> [<ffffffff81139699>] SyS_read+0x47/0x8b
>> [<ffffffff81577259>] tracesys+0xd0/0xd5
>> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> Are you sure those are the communicating tasks?

Normally I'd say yes. This time I'd say probably not. I am very much not
at my best right now.

I'll wait for it to implode and try the same thing again. On past form I
won't have to wait very many days...

(this time, there was a six-hour interval between boot and
misbehaviour. Whatever the misbehaviour *is*.)

One more instance I didn't share because I only have one end of it:
starting up ISC dhcpd 4.2.4 also hung unexpectedly (which it did not
after rebooting):

[<ffffffff814e3512>] unix_wait_for_peer+0x9f/0xbc
[<ffffffff814e5d48>] unix_dgram_sendmsg+0x41b/0x534
[<ffffffff8146618f>] sock_sendmsg+0x84/0x9e
[<ffffffff81467f3d>] SyS_sendto+0x10e/0x13f
[<ffffffff815770e2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

The common factor in these hangs is definitely unix_wait_for_peer. The
question is, what are they talking to? (In theory this could be a
userspace bug... but what common userspace factor is there between the
NFS server, OpenSSH, and ISC dhcpd? If it helps, named pipes may well be
suffering from the same malaise: /sbin/shutdown from sysvinit also hangs
and I have to /sbin/reboot -f instead. I'll check next time it hits, but
I'll bet it's trying to talk over /dev/initctl and getting nowhere.)

      reply	other threads:[~2014-04-28 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-25 20:37 possible 3.14.1 lockd problem (?) causing nfsd hangs Nix
2014-04-28 15:35 ` Unix-domain sockets hanging on 3.14.x (was Re: possible 3.14.1 lockd problem (?) causing nfsd hangs) Nix
2014-04-28 15:46   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-04-28 18:55     ` Nix [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ha5dp9l4.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix \
    --to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).