From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: gss-proxy@lists.fedorahosted.org,
"linux-nfs\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: migration from svcgssd to gssproxy results in regression.
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:14:01 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lgsgissm.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1291 bytes --]
Hi,
I recently tried using gssproxy for krb5 authentication with nfsd.
This was because customer is using an AD kerberos master which uses
certificates which are too big for svcgssd to work with (i.e. larger
than one page).
Unfortunately it doesn't work.
The svcgssd code in nfs-utils calls
gss_display_name()
to get the name of the principal. This returns something like
"user@domain".
getpwnam() works perfectly on this (when nsswitch is set to use "winbind")
but svcgssd goes further and uses nfs4_gss_princ_to_ids() to perform
the lookup. Presumably this is more general?
gssproxy does neither of these.
It uses gss_localname() to get the user name, which returns something
like "user".
It then calls getpwnam() on that, which fails ("user@domain" or
"domain\user" both succeed).
I have modified my copy to use gss_display_name() instead of
gss_localname() and it now appears to work perfectly ... for this
use-case at least.
What is the right way forward here?
Is nfs4_gss_princ_to_ids() really necessary?
Should gssproxy use it, at least for requests from the NFS server?
Is there are good reason not to use gss_display_name() uniformly?
Maybe use gss_local_name(), and it that fails, or getpwnam fails,
use gss_display_name()??
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-07 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-07 23:14 NeilBrown [this message]
2017-03-08 14:15 ` migration from svcgssd to gssproxy results in regression Scott Mayhew
2017-03-08 14:30 ` Scott Mayhew
2017-03-08 16:19 ` [gssproxy] " Simo Sorce
2017-03-09 0:57 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lgsgissm.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=gss-proxy@lists.fedorahosted.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).