linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about nfsdcltrack --storagedir
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:35:38 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lgwrklol.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161110163553.GA16125@fieldses.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3968 bytes --]

On Fri, Nov 11 2016, J. Bruce Fields wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:54:41AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 09 2016, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> 
>> > On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 14:46 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>  I notice that nfsdcltrack has a "--storagedir" option.
>> >>  I wonder how this can be used, given the nfsdcltrack is only(?) called
>> >>  from the kernel and there is no(?) mechanism to pass extra options.
>> >> 
>> >>  In a clustered-server context it would make sense(?) to share the
>> >>  database between cluster nodes and it is easiest to do this if the
>> >>  file in a separate filesystem (mounted as part of fail-over) rather
>> >>  than in /var.
>> >>  This can(?) be achieved using a symlink, but rpm likes to remove
>> >>  symlinks to non-existent locations.
>> >> 
>> >>  With NFSv3 the equivalent is the state files maintained by statd, and
>> >>  these can be relocated by passing the -P option to rpc.statd.
>> >>  How does one do a similar thing for NFSv4???
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >
>> > Ahh, I added that option mostly for when I was testing it. I did a lot
>> > of the earlier testing running it by hand, and --storagedir let me use a
>> > different directory for the db. I did have a vague idea that we might
>> > use it in the situation you describe, but I never wired that up as I
>> > didn't have a real need for it.
>> >
>> > We could add a new module parm that would set that option when the
>> > kernel does its callout, or allow passing the storagedir by environment
>> > variable.
>> >
>> > What would make the most sense from a usability standpoint?
>> 
>> Maybe a config file in /etc/ which nfsdcltrack reads on start-up?
>> Though in some ways I'd rather that instead of running a program, the
>> kernel sent a message to user-space.  Possibly a u-event?
>> Then existing configuration mechanisms could be used to choose a program
>> and a context for it to run in.
>> I wonder if u-events handle namespaces at all.
>> 
>> This came up because a customer was symlinking all of /var/lib/nfs to
>> shared storage (and lost their symlink thanks to rpm).  That isn't a
>> solution that I really like, and it led me to reflect on other things in
>> /var/lib/nfs.
>> 
>> etab - holds a normalized copy of /etc/exports, plus ad hoc changes.
>>        It would like in /run/nfs if we built this today
>> export-lock - lockfile to protect changes to above. Would also be
>>        in /run if we built it today. (I wonder why that doesn't
>>        use .etab.lock, which is already used for locking)
>> state, sm, sm.bak - statd state files.  These belong in /var/lib/nfs
>>        but are easily relocated with args to rpc.statd and sm-notify.
>> v4recovery - the NFSv4 version of above
>> xtab - this hasn't been needed since we gained /proc/fs/nfs/exports
>>        It is just a record of what should be in the kernel
>>        We should remove this.  I'll make a patch.
>> rmtab - this hasn't been needed since the "new cache" and the
>>        up-call mechanism were created.  It might be still used
>>        to respond to "showmount" commands, but that was never reliable.
>>        If we keep it, it should probably move to /run.
>>        But what do people think if finally discarding the old
>>        (non-new_cache) code and using that as an excuse to increment
>>        the major version number of nfs-utils?
>
> Looking at the history....  Looks like that went into 2.5.42 in late
> 2002.  In distro terms, first distros to support the new interface
> include RHEL4, Debian 3.1/Sarge, Suse 9.
>
> No comment on the other stuff, just wanted to check that as I'm inclined
> to extreme conservatism on backwards compatibility.  But, yeah, I guess
> that'd be OK.

Thanks.
On the flip side, kernels since 3.1 (4.5 years ago) cannot make use of
the code I'm suggesting be removed.  So it does feel like it might be time.

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 800 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2016-11-10 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-09  3:46 Question about nfsdcltrack --storagedir NeilBrown
2016-11-09 11:57 ` Jeff Layton
2016-11-09 23:54   ` NeilBrown
2016-11-10  0:55     ` Jeff Layton
2016-11-10  4:58       ` [PATCH/RFC nfs-utils] nfsdcltrack: read configuration from a file NeilBrown
2016-11-10 15:00         ` Jeff Layton
2016-11-10 22:17           ` NeilBrown
2016-11-13 12:40             ` Jeff Layton
2016-11-15 16:52               ` Steve Dickson
2016-11-15 17:07         ` Steve Dickson
2016-11-16 18:22         ` Steve Dickson
2016-11-10 14:55       ` Question about nfsdcltrack --storagedir Chuck Lever
2016-11-10 22:32         ` NeilBrown
2016-11-11 16:19           ` Chuck Lever
2016-11-16  4:00             ` NeilBrown
2016-11-10 16:35     ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-11-10 22:35       ` NeilBrown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lgwrklol.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).