From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
"linux-nfs\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFSv4.1 session reset needs to update ->rsize and ->wsize - how???
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 10:02:17 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o9dcvmk6.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7f84aced6ae709b1c66e1475e8d79927fa29132.camel@hammerspace.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2296 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 04 2018, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 08:47 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> With NFSv4.1, the server specifies max_rqst_sz and max_resp_sz in the
>> reply to CREATE session.
>>
>> If the client finds it needs to call nfs4_reset_session(), it might
>> get
>> smaller sizes back, so any pending read/writes would need to be
>> resized.
>>
>> However, I cannot see how the retry handling for reads/writes has any
>> chance to change the size. It looks like a request is broken up to
>> match the original ->rsize and ->wsize, then those individual IO
>> requests can be retried, but the higher level request is never
>> re-evaluated in light of a new size.
>>
>> Am I missing something, or is this not supported at present?
>> If it isn't supported, any suggestions on how best to handle a
>> reduction of the rsize/wsize ??
>>
>
> Why would a sane server want to do this?
Why would a sane protocol support it? :-)
I have a network trace of SLE11-SP4 (3.0 based) talking to "a NetApp
appliance".
It sends a 64K write and gets NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG.
It then closes the file (getting NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED even though it
used a seq number 1 more than the WRITE request), and then
DESTROY_SESSION and CREATE_SESSION.
The CREATE_SESSION gets "max req size" of 33812 and "max resp size" of
33672.
It then opens the file again and retries the 64K write....
I have a separate trace showing the initial mount where the sizes are 71680
and 81920.
I don't have a trace where it stops working, but reportedly writes work
smoothly for some hours after a mount, but then suddenly stop working.
The CREATE_SESSION *call* requests I see have the small (32K) sizes, but
presumably they are the result of a previous CREATE_SESSION reply giving
a small value.
I just had a thought.
If one session is shared by two "struct nfs_server" with different
->rsize or ->wsize, then the session might get set up with the smaller
size, and the mount using the larger size will get confused.
In 3.0 (and even 3.10) nfs4_init_session() limits the requested session
parameters to ->rsize and ->wsize.
That changed in 18aad3d552c7.
Maybe I just need to remove that code from nfs4_init_session().
I'll give it a try.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-05 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-04 22:47 NFSv4.1 session reset needs to update ->rsize and ->wsize - how??? NeilBrown
2018-09-04 23:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2018-09-05 0:02 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2018-09-05 13:44 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-09-05 15:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2018-09-05 15:46 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-09-05 21:12 ` NeilBrown
2018-09-05 21:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2018-09-05 22:10 ` NeilBrown
2018-09-06 17:03 ` Olga Kornievskaia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o9dcvmk6.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).