From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Joshua Watt <jpewhacker@gmail.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] SUNRPC: Add flag to kill new tasks
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:39:18 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o9oaewu1.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171108145942.5127-2-JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5127 bytes --]
On Wed, Nov 08 2017, Joshua Watt wrote:
> The new flag to rpc_killall_tasks() causes new tasks that are killed
> after to call to be killed immediately instead of being executed. This
> will all clients (particularly NFS) to prevents these task from delaying
> shutdown of the RPC session longer than necessary.
I have trouble remembering to proof-read my commit messages too. :-)
(I count 3 typos).
>
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/super.c | 4 ++--
> include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h | 1 +
> include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h | 2 +-
> net/sunrpc/clnt.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> net/sunrpc/sched.c | 7 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
> index 216f67d628b3..66fda2dcadd0 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
> @@ -903,10 +903,10 @@ void nfs_umount_begin(struct super_block *sb)
> /* -EIO all pending I/O */
> rpc = server->client_acl;
> if (!IS_ERR(rpc))
> - rpc_killall_tasks(rpc);
> + rpc_killall_tasks(rpc, 0);
> rpc = server->client;
> if (!IS_ERR(rpc))
> - rpc_killall_tasks(rpc);
> + rpc_killall_tasks(rpc, 0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_umount_begin);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h
> index 71c237e8240e..94f4e464de1b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct rpc_clnt {
> cl_noretranstimeo: 1,/* No retransmit timeouts */
> cl_autobind : 1,/* use getport() */
> cl_chatty : 1;/* be verbose */
> + bool cl_kill_new_tasks; /* Kill all new tasks */
>
> struct rpc_rtt * cl_rtt; /* RTO estimator data */
> const struct rpc_timeout *cl_timeout; /* Timeout strategy */
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h
> index d96e74e114c0..9b8bebaee0f4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void rpc_put_task_async(struct rpc_task *);
> void rpc_exit_task(struct rpc_task *);
> void rpc_exit(struct rpc_task *, int);
> void rpc_release_calldata(const struct rpc_call_ops *, void *);
> -void rpc_killall_tasks(struct rpc_clnt *);
> +void rpc_killall_tasks(struct rpc_clnt *clnt, int kill_new_tasks);
> void rpc_execute(struct rpc_task *);
> void rpc_init_priority_wait_queue(struct rpc_wait_queue *, const char *);
> void rpc_init_wait_queue(struct rpc_wait_queue *, const char *);
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> index df4ecb042ebe..70005252b32f 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> @@ -814,14 +814,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpc_clnt_iterate_for_each_xprt);
> * Kill all tasks for the given client.
> * XXX: kill their descendants as well?
> */
> -void rpc_killall_tasks(struct rpc_clnt *clnt)
> +void rpc_killall_tasks(struct rpc_clnt *clnt, int kill_new_tasks)
> {
> struct rpc_task *rovr;
>
> + dprintk("RPC: killing all tasks for client %p\n", clnt);
> +
> + if (kill_new_tasks) {
> + WRITE_ONCE(clnt->cl_kill_new_tasks, true);
> +
> + /* Ensure the kill flag is set before checking the task list */
> + smp_mb();
> + }
I don't find this smp_mb() usage convincing. It might be "right", but
to me it looks weird.
Partly, this is because there is a perfectly good spinlock that would
make the code obviously correct.
I would remove the short-circuit (which returns if list_empty()) and
always take the spinlock. Then
if (kill_new_tasks)
clnt->cl_kill_new_tasks = true;
In __rpc_execute() I would just have
if (task->tk_client->cl_kill_new_tasks)
rpc_exit(task, -EIO);
As the task was added to the client list with the cl_lock spinlock
helds, there are no visibility issues to require a memory barrier.
Otherwise, the patch seems to make sense.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> if (list_empty(&clnt->cl_tasks))
> return;
> - dprintk("RPC: killing all tasks for client %p\n", clnt);
> /*
> * Spin lock all_tasks to prevent changes...
> */
> @@ -854,7 +861,7 @@ void rpc_shutdown_client(struct rpc_clnt *clnt)
> rcu_dereference(clnt->cl_xprt)->servername);
>
> while (!list_empty(&clnt->cl_tasks)) {
> - rpc_killall_tasks(clnt);
> + rpc_killall_tasks(clnt, 0);
> wait_event_timeout(destroy_wait,
> list_empty(&clnt->cl_tasks), 1*HZ);
> }
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/sched.c b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
> index 0cc83839c13c..c9bf1ab9e941 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/sched.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
> @@ -748,6 +748,13 @@ static void __rpc_execute(struct rpc_task *task)
> dprintk("RPC: %5u __rpc_execute flags=0x%x\n",
> task->tk_pid, task->tk_flags);
>
> + /* Ensure the task is in the client task list before checking the kill
> + * flag
> + */
> + smp_mb();
> + if (READ_ONCE(task->tk_client->cl_kill_new_tasks))
> + rpc_exit(task, -EIO);
> +
> WARN_ON_ONCE(RPC_IS_QUEUED(task));
> if (RPC_IS_QUEUED(task))
> return;
> --
> 2.13.6
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-10 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-25 17:11 NFS Force Unmounting Joshua Watt
2017-10-30 20:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-10-30 21:04 ` Joshua Watt
2017-10-30 21:09 ` NeilBrown
2017-10-31 14:41 ` Jeff Layton
2017-10-31 14:55 ` Chuck Lever
2017-10-31 17:04 ` Joshua Watt
2017-10-31 19:46 ` Chuck Lever
2017-11-01 0:53 ` NeilBrown
2017-11-01 2:22 ` Chuck Lever
2017-11-01 14:38 ` Joshua Watt
2017-11-02 0:15 ` NeilBrown
2017-11-02 19:46 ` Chuck Lever
2017-11-02 21:51 ` NeilBrown
2017-11-01 17:24 ` Jeff Layton
2017-11-01 23:13 ` NeilBrown
2017-11-02 12:09 ` Jeff Layton
2017-11-02 14:54 ` Joshua Watt
2017-11-08 3:30 ` NeilBrown
2017-11-08 12:08 ` Jeff Layton
2017-11-08 15:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-11-08 22:34 ` NeilBrown
2017-11-08 23:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2017-11-09 19:48 ` Joshua Watt
2017-11-10 0:16 ` NeilBrown
2017-11-08 14:59 ` [RFC 0/4] " Joshua Watt
2017-11-08 14:59 ` [RFC 1/4] SUNRPC: Add flag to kill new tasks Joshua Watt
2017-11-10 1:39 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-11-08 14:59 ` [RFC 2/4] SUNRPC: Kill client tasks from debugfs Joshua Watt
2017-11-10 1:47 ` NeilBrown
2017-11-10 14:13 ` Joshua Watt
2017-11-08 14:59 ` [RFC 3/4] SUNRPC: Simplify client shutdown Joshua Watt
2017-11-10 1:50 ` NeilBrown
2017-11-08 14:59 ` [RFC 4/4] NFS: Add forcekill mount option Joshua Watt
2017-11-10 2:01 ` NeilBrown
2017-11-10 14:16 ` Joshua Watt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o9oaewu1.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=jpewhacker@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).