linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] NFSv4: change nfs4_select_rw_stateid to take a lock_context inplace of lock_owner
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:57:55 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zilzx2ek.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <147633280750.766.16214787133000729977.stgit@noble>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3138 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 13 2016, NeilBrown wrote:

> The only time that a lock_context is not immediately available is in
> setattr, and now that it has an open_context, it can easily find one
> with nfs_get_lock_context.
> This removes the need for the on-stack nfs_lockowner.
>
> This change is preparation for correctly support flock stateids.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h   |    2 +-
>  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c  |   15 ++++++---------
>  fs/nfs/nfs4state.c |   11 +++++------
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h b/fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h
> index 9b3a82abab07..7784b79915e1 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h
> @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ extern void nfs41_handle_server_scope(struct nfs_client *,
>  extern void nfs4_put_lock_state(struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp);
>  extern int nfs4_set_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state, struct file_lock *fl);
>  extern int nfs4_select_rw_stateid(struct nfs4_state *, fmode_t,
> -		const struct nfs_lockowner *, nfs4_stateid *,
> +		const struct nfs_lock_context *, nfs4_stateid *,
>  		struct rpc_cred **);
>  
>  extern struct nfs_seqid *nfs_alloc_seqid(struct nfs_seqid_counter *counter, gfp_t gfp_mask);
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index 950b25413bb4..3c2f11189794 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -2926,12 +2926,13 @@ static int _nfs4_do_setattr(struct inode *inode,
>  	if (nfs4_copy_delegation_stateid(inode, fmode, &arg->stateid, &delegation_cred)) {
>  		/* Use that stateid */
>  	} else if (truncate && ctx != NULL) {
> -		struct nfs_lockowner lockowner = {
> -			.l_owner = current->files,
> -		};
> +		struct nfs_lock_context *l_ctx;
>  		if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(ctx->state))
>  			return -EBADF;
> -		if (nfs4_select_rw_stateid(ctx->state, FMODE_WRITE, &lockowner,
> +		l_ctx = nfs_get_lock_context(ctx);
> +		if (IS_ERR(l_ctx))
> +			return PTR_ERR(l_ctx);
> +		if (nfs4_select_rw_stateid(ctx->state, FMODE_WRITE, l_ctx,
>  				&arg->stateid, &delegation_cred) == -EIO)
>  			return -EBADF;

Oops...
I have an nfs_get_lock_context() here with no matching
nfs_put_lock_context();


I've merged:

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 3c2f11189794..be4e3d9de1eb 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2932,8 +2932,10 @@ static int _nfs4_do_setattr(struct inode *inode,
 		l_ctx = nfs_get_lock_context(ctx);
 		if (IS_ERR(l_ctx))
 			return PTR_ERR(l_ctx);
-		if (nfs4_select_rw_stateid(ctx->state, FMODE_WRITE, l_ctx,
-				&arg->stateid, &delegation_cred) == -EIO)
+		status = nfs4_select_rw_stateid(ctx->state, FMODE_WRITE, l_ctx,
+						&arg->stateid, &delegation_cred);
+		nfs_put_lock_context(l_ctx);
+		if (status == -EIO)
 			return -EBADF;
 	} else
 		nfs4_stateid_copy(&arg->stateid, &zero_stateid);

into that patch and pushed out a new

  git://neil.brown.name/linux tags/nfs-flock-fix

 (3f5546538d7c678b82d10ce6add29a6d92565f1e)


Please let me know if I should re-post the series.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 800 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-20  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-13  4:26 [PATCH 0/6] NFSv4: Fix stateid used when flock locks in use. - V2 NeilBrown
2016-10-13  4:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] NFSv4: add flock_owner to open context NeilBrown
2016-10-13  4:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] NFS: remove l_pid field from nfs_lockowner NeilBrown
2016-10-13  4:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] NFS: discard nfs_lockowner structure NeilBrown
2016-10-13  4:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] NFSv4: change nfs4_select_rw_stateid to take a lock_context inplace of lock_owner NeilBrown
2016-10-20  0:57   ` NeilBrown [this message]
2016-10-13  4:26 ` [PATCH 5/6] NFSv4: enhance nfs4_copy_lock_stateid to use a flock stateid if there is one NeilBrown
2016-10-13 15:22   ` Jeff Layton
2016-10-14  0:22     ` NeilBrown
2016-10-14 10:49       ` Jeff Layton
2016-12-19  0:33         ` [PATCH] NFSv4: ensure __nfs4_find_lock_state returns consistent result NeilBrown
2016-10-13  4:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] NFSv4: change nfs4_do_setattr to take an open_context instead of a nfs4_state NeilBrown
2016-11-02 15:49   ` Benjamin Coddington
2016-11-02 23:34     ` NeilBrown
2016-11-03 16:38       ` Benjamin Coddington
2016-11-03 23:12         ` Benjamin Coddington
2016-10-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 0/6] NFSv4: Fix stateid used when flock locks in use. - V2 Jeff Layton
2016-10-18 21:52   ` NeilBrown
2016-11-18  4:59     ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zilzx2ek.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).