From: Calum Mackay <calum.mackay@oracle.com>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Cc: Calum Mackay <calum.mackay@oracle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"patches@lists.linux.dev" <patches@lists.linux.dev>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"patches@kernelci.org" <patches@kernelci.org>,
"lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org" <lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org>,
"pavel@denx.de" <pavel@denx.de>,
"jonathanh@nvidia.com" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
"srw@sladewatkins.net" <srw@sladewatkins.net>,
"rwarsow@gmx.de" <rwarsow@gmx.de>,
"conor@kernel.org" <conor@kernel.org>,
"allen.lkml@gmail.com" <allen.lkml@gmail.com>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@oracle.com>,
Ramanan Govindarajan <ramanan.govindarajan@oracle.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/57] 5.15.155-rc1 review
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 21:06:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b125c1d-c7de-4df1-b8fc-5e2ae2279f32@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27E1E4C4-86C3-4D78-AF85-50C1612675E0@oracle.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5360 bytes --]
On 12/04/2024 4:57 pm, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 12, 2024, at 6:25 AM, Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>>
>> On 11/04/24 15:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.155 release.
>>> There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:53:55 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> I have noticed a regression in lts test case with nfsv4 and this was overlooked in the previous cycle(5.15.154). So the regression is from 153-->154 update. And I think that is due to nfs backports we had in 5.15.154.
>>
>> # ./runltp -d /tmpdir -s fcntl17
>>
>> <<<test_start>>>
>> tag=fcntl17 stime=1712915065
>> cmdline="fcntl17"
>> contacts=""
>> analysis=exit
>> <<<test_output>>>
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : Enter preparation phase
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : Exit preparation phase
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : Enter block 1
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 1 starting
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 1 pid 22904 locked
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 2 starting
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 2 pid 22905 locked
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 3 starting
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 3 pid 22906 locked
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 2 resuming
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 3 resuming
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 1 resuming
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 3 lockw err 35
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 3 exiting
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 1 unlocked
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 1 exiting
>> fcntl17 1 TFAIL : fcntl17.c:429: Alarm expired, deadlock not detected
>> fcntl17 0 TWARN : fcntl17.c:430: You may need to kill child processes by hand
>> fcntl17 2 TPASS : Block 1 PASSED
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : Exit block 1
>> fcntl17 0 TWARN : tst_tmpdir.c:342: tst_rmdir: rmobj(/tmpdir/ltp-jRFBtBQhhx/LTP_fcnp7lqPn) failed: unlink(/tmpdir/ltp-jRFBtBQhhx/LTP_fcnp7lqPn) failed; errno=2: ENOENT
>> <<<execution_status>>>
>> initiation_status="ok"
>> duration=10 termination_type=exited termination_id=5 corefile=no
>> cutime=0 cstime=0
>> <<<test_end>>>
>> <<<test_start>>>
>> tag=fcntl17_64 stime=1712915075
>> cmdline="fcntl17_64"
>> contacts=""
>> analysis=exit
>> <<<test_output>>>
>> incrementing stop
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : Enter preparation phase
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : Exit preparation phase
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : Enter block 1
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 1 starting
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 1 pid 22909 locked
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 2 starting
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 2 pid 22910 locked
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 3 starting
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 3 pid 22911 locked
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 2 resuming
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 3 resuming
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 1 resuming
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 3 lockw err 35
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 3 exiting
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 1 unlocked
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : child 1 exiting
>> fcntl17 1 TFAIL : fcntl17.c:429: Alarm expired, deadlock not detected
>> fcntl17 0 TWARN : fcntl17.c:430: You may need to kill child processes by hand
>> fcntl17 2 TPASS : Block 1 PASSED
>> fcntl17 0 TINFO : Exit block 1
>> fcntl17 0 TWARN : tst_tmpdir.c:342: tst_rmdir: rmobj(/tmpdir/ltp-jRFBtBQhhx/LTP_fcn9Xy4hM) failed: unlink(/tmpdir/ltp-jRFBtBQhhx/LTP_fcn9Xy4hM) failed; errno=2: ENOENT
>> <<<execution_status>>>
>> initiation_status="ok"
>> duration=10 termination_type=exited termination_id=5 corefile=no
>> cutime=0 cstime=0
>> <<<test_end>>>
>> INFO: ltp-pan reported some tests FAIL
>> LTP Version: 20240129-167-gb592cdd0d
>>
>>
>> Steps used after installing latest ltp:
>>
>> $ mkdir /tmpdir
>> $ yum install nfs-utils -y
>> $ echo "/media *(rw,no_root_squash,sync)" >/etc/exports
>> $ systemctl start nfs-server.service
>> $ mount -o rw,nfsvers=3 127.0.0.1:/media /tmpdir
>> $ cd /opt/ltp
>> $ ./runltp -d /tmpdir -s fcntl17
>>
>>
>>
>> This does not happen in 5.15.153 tag.
>>
>> Adding nfs people to the CC list
>
> The reproducer uses NFSv3, but the bug report says NFSv4
> at the top.
>
> I was able to reproduce this on my nfsd-5.15.y branch
> with NFSv3.
>
> A bisect would be most helpful.
Interestingly, this same LTP fcntl17 test failure was reported to me
internally some time back, in late 2022; at the time it was bisected to:
6930bcbfb6ce lockd: detect and reject lock arguments that overflow
mainline v6.0-rc1
stable v5.15.61
However, the failure was intermittent, and seemed very dependent on test
system configuration; eventually it disappeared, so I put it down to
test issues.
Harshit will continue to bisect this new case.
cheers,
calum.
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Harshit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.155-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>> thanks,
>>> greg k-h
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240411095407.982258070@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-12 10:25 ` [PATCH 5.15 00/57] 5.15.155-rc1 review Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-04-12 10:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-12 15:57 ` Chuck Lever III
2024-04-12 20:06 ` Calum Mackay [this message]
2024-04-12 20:11 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-04-12 20:23 ` Chuck Lever
2024-04-12 21:34 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-04-13 15:56 ` Chuck Lever
2024-04-14 6:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-15 13:31 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b125c1d-c7de-4df1-b8fc-5e2ae2279f32@oracle.com \
--to=calum.mackay@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=allen.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=darren.kenny@oracle.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=ramanan.govindarajan@oracle.com \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).