From: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/18] pnfs-submit: remove _pnfs_can_return_lseg call from pnfs_clear_lseg_list
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:52:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik69Y1+qmxF2QPKXM_4-VQsseRQ672S+u23h4nX@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDB94AA.3020508@panasas.com>
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> wrote:
> On 2010-11-10 16:46, Fred Isaman wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> wrote:
>>> On 2010-11-04 17:22, Fred Isaman wrote:
>>>> Instead, have mark_invalid function that marks lseg invalid and
>>>> removes the reference that holds it in the list. Now when io is finished,
>>>> the lseg will automatically be removed from the list. This is
>>>> at the heart of many of the upcoming cb_layoutrecall changes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c | 3 +-
>>>> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>> fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 1 +
>>>> 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
>>>> index 238eeb2..6d9ef2b 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
>>>> @@ -1915,8 +1915,7 @@ encode_layoutreturn(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
>>>> p = reserve_space(xdr, 16 + NFS4_STATEID_SIZE);
>>>> p = xdr_encode_hyper(p, args->range.offset);
>>>> p = xdr_encode_hyper(p, args->range.length);
>>>> - pnfs_get_layout_stateid(&stateid, NFS_I(args->inode)->layout,
>>>> - NULL);
>>>> + pnfs_copy_layout_stateid(&stateid, NFS_I(args->inode)->layout);
>>>> p = xdr_encode_opaque_fixed(p, &stateid.data,
>>>> NFS4_STATEID_SIZE);
>>>> p = reserve_space(xdr, 4);
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>>> index 3bbe3be..4e5c68b 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>>> @@ -272,10 +272,42 @@ init_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>>>> lseg->layout = lo;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static void
>>>> +_put_lseg_common(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>>>> +{
>>>> + BUG_ON(lseg->valid == true);
>>>> + list_del(&lseg->fi_list);
>>>> + if (list_empty(&lseg->layout->segs)) {
>>>> + struct nfs_client *clp;
>>>> +
>>>> + clp = NFS_SERVER(lseg->layout->inode)->nfs_client;
>>>> + spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
>>>> + /* List does not take a reference, so no need for put here */
>>>> + list_del_init(&lseg->layout->layouts);
>>>> + spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
>>>> + pnfs_invalidate_layout_stateid(lseg->layout);
>>>> + }
>>>> + rpc_wake_up(&NFS_I(lseg->layout->inode)->lo_rpcwaitq);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/* The use of tmp_list is necessary because pnfs_curr_ld->free_lseg
>>>> + * could sleep, so must be called outside of the lock.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static void
>>>> +put_lseg_locked(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
>>>> + struct list_head *tmp_list)
>>>> +{
>>>> + dprintk("%s: lseg %p ref %d valid %d\n", __func__, lseg,
>>>> + atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount), lseg->valid);
>>>> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&lseg->pls_refcount)) {
>>>> + _put_lseg_common(lseg);
>>>> + list_add(&lseg->fi_list, tmp_list);
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> void
>>>> put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>>>> {
>>>> - bool do_wake_up;
>>>> struct inode *ino;
>>>>
>>>> if (!lseg)
>>>> @@ -283,15 +315,14 @@ put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>>>>
>>>> dprintk("%s: lseg %p ref %d valid %d\n", __func__, lseg,
>>>> atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount), lseg->valid);
>>>> - do_wake_up = !lseg->valid;
>>>> ino = lseg->layout->inode;
>>>> - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&lseg->pls_refcount)) {
>>>> + if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&lseg->pls_refcount, &ino->i_lock)) {
>>>> + _put_lseg_common(lseg);
>>>> + spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
>>>> NFS_SERVER(ino)->pnfs_curr_ld->free_lseg(lseg);
>>>> /* Matched by get_layout_hdr_locked in pnfs_insert_layout */
>>>> put_layout_hdr(ino);
>>>> }
>>>> - if (do_wake_up)
>>>> - rpc_wake_up(&NFS_I(ino)->lo_rpcwaitq);
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(put_lseg);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -314,10 +345,18 @@ should_free_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
>>>> lseg->range.iomode == range->iomode);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static bool
>>>> -_pnfs_can_return_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>>>> +static void mark_lseg_invalid(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
>>>> + struct list_head *tmp_list)
>>>> {
>>>> - return atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount) == 1;
>>>> + assert_spin_locked(&lseg->layout->inode->i_lock);
>>>> + if (lseg->valid) {
>>>> + lseg->valid = false;
>>>> + /* Remove the reference keeping the lseg in the
>>>> + * list. It will now be removed when all
>>>> + * outstanding io is finished.
>>>> + */
>>>> + put_lseg_locked(lseg, tmp_list);
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void
>>>> @@ -330,42 +369,31 @@ pnfs_clear_lseg_list(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, struct list_head *tmp_list,
>>>> __func__, lo, range->offset, range->length, range->iomode);
>>>>
>>>> assert_spin_locked(&lo->inode->i_lock);
>>>> - list_for_each_entry_safe(lseg, next, &lo->segs, fi_list) {
>>>> - if (!should_free_lseg(lseg, range) ||
>>>> - !_pnfs_can_return_lseg(lseg))
>>>> - continue;
>>>> - dprintk("%s: freeing lseg %p iomode %d "
>>>> - "offset %llu length %llu\n", __func__,
>>>> - lseg, lseg->range.iomode, lseg->range.offset,
>>>> - lseg->range.length);
>>>> - list_move(&lseg->fi_list, tmp_list);
>>>> - }
>>>> - if (list_empty(&lo->segs)) {
>>>> - struct nfs_client *clp;
>>>> -
>>>> - clp = NFS_SERVER(lo->inode)->nfs_client;
>>>> - spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
>>>> - /* List does not take a reference, so no need for put here */
>>>> - list_del_init(&lo->layouts);
>>>> - spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
>>>> - pnfs_invalidate_layout_stateid(lo);
>>>> - }
>>>> -
>>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(lseg, next, &lo->segs, fi_list)
>>>> + if (should_free_lseg(lseg, range)) {
>>>> + dprintk("%s: freeing lseg %p iomode %d "
>>>> + "offset %llu length %llu\n", __func__,
>>>> + lseg, lseg->range.iomode, lseg->range.offset,
>>>> + lseg->range.length);
>>>> + mark_lseg_invalid(lseg, tmp_list);
>>>> + }
>>>> dprintk("%s:Return\n", __func__);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void
>>>> -pnfs_free_lseg_list(struct list_head *tmp_list)
>>>> +pnfs_free_lseg_list(struct list_head *free_me)
>>>> {
>>>> - struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg;
>>>> + struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg, *tmp;
>>>> + struct inode *ino;
>>>>
>>>> - while (!list_empty(tmp_list)) {
>>>> - lseg = list_entry(tmp_list->next, struct pnfs_layout_segment,
>>>> - fi_list);
>>>> - dprintk("%s calling put_lseg on %p\n", __func__, lseg);
>>>> - list_del(&lseg->fi_list);
>>>> - put_lseg(lseg);
>>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(lseg, tmp, free_me, fi_list) {
>>>> + BUG_ON(atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount) != 0);
>>>> + ino = lseg->layout->inode;
>>>> + NFS_SERVER(ino)->pnfs_curr_ld->free_lseg(lseg);
>>>> + /* Matched by get_layout_hdr_locked in pnfs_insert_layout */
>>>> + put_layout_hdr(ino);
>>>> }
>>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(free_me);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> void
>>>> @@ -463,6 +491,17 @@ pnfs_layout_from_open_stateid(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
>>>> dprintk("<-- %s\n", __func__);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +/* Layoutreturn may use an invalid stateid, just copy what is there */
>>>> +void pnfs_copy_layout_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst, struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int seq;
>>>> +
>>>> + do {
>>>> + seq = read_seqbegin(&lo->seqlock);
>>>> + memcpy(dst->data, lo->stateid.data, sizeof(lo->stateid.data));
>>>> + } while (read_seqretry(&lo->seqlock, seq));
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> void
>>>> pnfs_get_layout_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst, struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
>>>> struct nfs4_state *open_state)
>>>> @@ -546,25 +585,23 @@ has_layout_to_return(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
>>>> return out;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +/* Return true if there is layout based io in progress in the given range.
>>>> + * Assumes range has already been marked invalid, and layout marked to
>>>> + * prevent any new lseg from being inserted.
>>>> + */
>>>> bool
>>>> pnfs_return_layout_barrier(struct nfs_inode *nfsi,
>>>> struct pnfs_layout_range *range)
>>>> {
>>>> - struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg;
>>>> + struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg, *tmp;
>>>> bool ret = false;
>>>>
>>>> spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
>>>> - list_for_each_entry(lseg, &nfsi->layout->segs, fi_list) {
>>>> - if (!should_free_lseg(lseg, range))
>>>> - continue;
>>>> - lseg->valid = false;
>>>> - if (!_pnfs_can_return_lseg(lseg)) {
>>>> - dprintk("%s: wait on lseg %p refcount %d\n",
>>>> - __func__, lseg,
>>>> - atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount));
>>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(lseg, tmp, &nfsi->layout->segs, fi_list)
>>>
>>> Why do you need the safe version here while the inode is locked?
>>>
>>
>> We don't.
>
> OK. I'll fix that then :)
>
>>
>>
>>>> + if (should_free_lseg(lseg, range)) {
>>>> ret = true;
>>>
>>> But this will always return "true" if there's any lseg to return,
>>> not only if (!_pnfs_can_return_lseg(lseg)).
>>>
>>> What am I missing? :)
>>>
>>
>> A return of "true" means the caller should wait. So if there is any
>> lseg still left to return, we should return true. The refcounting has
>> changed so that once the pending IO is finished, the lseg will
>> automatically be removed from the list. I suspect that what you are
>> missing is that...the refcount in the invalid case is one less than
>> what it used to be.
>
> Thanks. I see what you mean now.
>
> What's missing is plh_block_lgets which is introduced only
> in [PATCH 13/18] pnfs-submit: rewrite of layout state handling and cb_layoutrecall
> Otherwise, new lsegs can be inserted into the list in between.
>
> Benny
>
Hmmm, you're right. Let me see if I can tease out enough of the
blocking code from patch 13 to make it work. The other option is to
just merge the two patches together.
Fred
>>
>> Fred
>>
>>> Benny
>>>
>>>> + break;
>>>> }
>>>> - }
>>>> spin_unlock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
>>>> dprintk("%s:Return %d\n", __func__, ret);
>>>> return ret;
>>>> @@ -574,12 +611,10 @@ void
>>>> pnfs_layoutreturn_release(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp)
>>>> {
>>>> struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode)->layout;
>>>> - LIST_HEAD(tmp_list);
>>>>
>>>> if (lrp->args.return_type != RETURN_FILE)
>>>> return;
>>>> spin_lock(&lrp->args.inode->i_lock);
>>>> - pnfs_clear_lseg_list(lo, &tmp_list, &lrp->args.range);
>>>> if (!lrp->res.valid)
>>>> ; /* forgetful model internal release */
>>>> else if (!lrp->res.lrs_present)
>>>> @@ -588,7 +623,6 @@ pnfs_layoutreturn_release(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp)
>>>> pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &lrp->res.stateid);
>>>> put_layout_hdr_locked(lo); /* Matched in _pnfs_return_layout */
>>>> spin_unlock(&lrp->args.inode->i_lock);
>>>> - pnfs_free_lseg_list(&tmp_list);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static int
>>>> @@ -641,7 +675,11 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
>>>> arg.offset = 0;
>>>> arg.length = NFS4_MAX_UINT64;
>>>>
>>>> + /* probably should BUGON if type != RETURN_FILE */
>>>> if (type == RETURN_FILE) {
>>>> + LIST_HEAD(tmp_list);
>>>> + struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg, *tmp;
>>>> +
>>>> spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
>>>> lo = nfsi->layout;
>>>> if (lo && !has_layout_to_return(lo, &arg))
>>>> @@ -652,10 +690,13 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
>>>> goto out;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(lseg, tmp, &lo->segs, fi_list)
>>>> + if (should_free_lseg(lseg, &arg))
>>>> + mark_lseg_invalid(lseg, &tmp_list);
>>>> /* Reference matched in pnfs_layoutreturn_release */
>>>> get_layout_hdr_locked(lo);
>>>> -
>>>> spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
>>>> + pnfs_free_lseg_list(&tmp_list);
>>>>
>>>> if (layoutcommit_needed(nfsi)) {
>>>> if (stateid && !wait) { /* callback */
>>>> @@ -1171,7 +1212,7 @@ pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(struct inode *inode, int sync)
>>>> nfsi->layout->write_end_pos = 0;
>>>> nfsi->layout->cred = NULL;
>>>> __clear_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_NEED_LCOMMIT, &nfsi->layout->state);
>>>> - pnfs_get_layout_stateid(&data->args.stateid, nfsi->layout, NULL);
>>>> + pnfs_copy_layout_stateid(&data->args.stateid, nfsi->layout);
>>>>
>>>> /* Reference for layoutcommit matched in pnfs_layoutcommit_release */
>>>> get_layout_hdr_locked(NFS_I(inode)->layout);
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
>>>> index 05dd5e0..000acf0 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
>>>> @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ void pnfs_layoutreturn_release(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lpr);
>>>> void pnfs_destroy_layout(struct nfs_inode *);
>>>> void pnfs_destroy_all_layouts(struct nfs_client *);
>>>> void put_layout_hdr(struct inode *inode);
>>>> +void pnfs_copy_layout_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst, struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo);
>>>> void pnfs_get_layout_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst, struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
>>>> struct nfs4_state *open_state);
>>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-11 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-04 15:22 [PATCH 00/18] rewrite of CB_LAYOUTRECALL and layoutstate code Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 01/18] NFSv4.1: Callback share session between ops Fred Isaman
2010-11-10 13:37 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-10 13:41 ` [PATCH] SQUASHME: pnfs-submit: fixups for nfsv4.1 callbacks Benny Halevy
2010-11-10 14:53 ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 02/18] pnfs-submit: change pnfs_layout_segment refcounting from kref to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 03/18] pnfs-submit: remove _pnfs_can_return_lseg call from pnfs_clear_lseg_list Fred Isaman
2010-11-10 14:35 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-10 14:46 ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-11 7:00 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-11 13:52 ` Fred Isaman [this message]
2010-11-11 14:39 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 04/18] pnfs-submit: change layout state seqlock to a spinlock Fred Isaman
2010-11-11 15:00 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-11 15:09 ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 05/18] pnfs-submit: layoutreturn' rpc_call_op functions need to handle bulk returns Fred Isaman
2010-11-11 15:01 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 06/18] pnfs_submit: nfs4_layoutreturn_release should not reference results Fred Isaman
2010-11-11 15:16 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 07/18] pnfs-submit: reorganize struct cb_layoutrecallargs Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 08/18] pnfs-submit: rename lo->state to lo->plh_flags Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 09/18] pnfs-submit: change pnfs_layout_hdr refcount to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 10/18] pnfs-submit: argument to should_free_lseg changed from lseg to range Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 11/18] pnfs-submit: remove unnecessary field lgp->status Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 12/18] pnfs-submit: remove RPC_ASSASSINATED(task) checks Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 13/18] pnfs-submit: rewrite of layout state handling and cb_layoutrecall Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 14/18] pnfs-submit: increase number of outstanding CB_LAYOUTRECALLS we can handle Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 15/18] pnfs-submit: roc add layoutreturn op to close compound Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 16/18] pnfs-submit refactor layoutcommit xdr structures Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 17/18] pnfs-submit refactor pnfs_layoutcommit_setup Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 18/18] pnfs_submit: roc add layoutcommit op to close compound Fred Isaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTik69Y1+qmxF2QPKXM_4-VQsseRQ672S+u23h4nX@mail.gmail.com \
--to=iisaman@netapp.com \
--cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).