From: "Patrick J. LoPresti" <lopresti@gmail.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Use hi-res clock for file timestamps
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:53:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinJ04d2Bjuv2E4OOG=35TSHArEP6cHqGUQVUoy2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1281726579.2810.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:09 PM, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> So other then "show some numbers", my only thought that might make the
> patch more attractive is that rather than a global change, or a static
> CONFIG_ option, would it maybe make more sense as a mount option?
I really like this idea.
Consider the following "revision 2" of my proposal:
1) Add a function pointer "current_fs_time" to struct super_block.
2) Replace all calls of the form:
current_fs_time(sb);
with
sb->current_fs_time(sb);
3) Arrange for the default value to point to the current implementation.
These first three could be one patch. They change no functionality;
they just enable the next step.
Finally:
4) Add a mount option to cause sb->current_fs_time(sb) to use the
hi-res implementation.
Comments?
- Pat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-13 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-13 18:25 Proposal: Use hi-res clock for file timestamps Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-13 18:45 ` john stultz
2010-08-13 18:57 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-13 19:09 ` john stultz
2010-08-13 20:53 ` Patrick J. LoPresti [this message]
2010-08-14 16:45 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-15 1:50 ` Bret Towe
2010-08-13 19:57 ` Jim Rees
2010-08-13 20:26 ` john stultz
2010-08-13 20:52 ` Jim Rees
2010-08-17 14:54 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-17 17:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-17 18:29 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-17 18:50 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-17 19:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-17 19:18 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-17 19:39 ` Alan Cox
2010-08-17 19:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-17 19:52 ` Alan Cox
2010-08-18 5:53 ` Neil Brown
2010-08-18 14:46 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-18 17:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-18 18:15 ` Chuck Lever
2010-08-18 23:41 ` Neil Brown
2010-08-19 0:52 ` Neil Brown
2010-08-19 2:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-19 2:44 ` Neil Brown
2010-08-19 22:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-18 23:47 ` Neil Brown
2010-08-18 17:50 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-18 18:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-18 19:25 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-18 19:30 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-17 19:34 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-17 19:54 ` Alan Cox
2010-08-17 19:43 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-17 19:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-18 18:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-19 1:41 ` john stultz
2010-08-19 2:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-19 3:17 ` john stultz
2010-08-19 22:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-18 18:20 ` David Woodhouse
2010-08-18 18:32 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2010-08-18 18:53 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTinJ04d2Bjuv2E4OOG=35TSHArEP6cHqGUQVUoy2@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=lopresti@gmail.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).