Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Cc: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Helen Chao <helen.chao@oracle.com>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Fwd: [PATCH] SUNRPC: remove the maximum number of retries in call_bind_status
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:38:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ACE2DBA2-0F3D-47EF-9167-9D45F5BE57E5@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ed870a33-0809-3cfd-2d5a-b97409568b97@oracle.com

We need to hear from the NFS client maintainers about
the below question and the patch.


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: dai.ngo@oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: remove the maximum number of retries in call_bind_status
> Date: March 14, 2023 at 12:19:30 PM EDT
> To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, Helen Chao <helen.chao@oracle.com>
> 
> 
> On 3/8/23 11:03 AM, dai.ngo@oracle.com wrote:
>> On 3/8/23 10:50 AM, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 8, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Currently call_bind_status places a hard limit of 3 to the number of
>>>> retries on EACCES error. This limit was done to accommodate the behavior
>>>> of a buggy server that keeps returning garbage when the NLM daemon is
>>>> killed on the NFS server. However this change causes problem for other
>>>> servers that take a little longer than 9 seconds for the port mapper to
>>>> become ready when the NFS server is restarted.
>>>> 
>>>> This patch removes this hard coded limit and let the RPC handles
>>>> the retry according to whether the export is soft or hard mounted.
>>>> 
>>>> To avoid the hang with buggy server, the client can use soft mount for
>>>> the export.
>>>> 
>>>> Fixes: 0b760113a3a1 ("NLM: Don't hang forever on NLM unlock requests")
>>>> Reported-by: Helen Chao <helen.chao@oracle.com>
>>>> Tested-by: Helen Chao <helen.chao@oracle.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
>>> Helen is the royal queen of ^C  ;-)
>>> 
>>> Did you try ^C on a mount while it waits for a rebind?
>> 
>> She uses a test script that restarts the NFS server while NLM lock test
>> is running. The failure is random, sometimes it fails and sometimes it
>> passes depending on when the LOCK/UNLOCK requests come in so I think
>> it's hard to time it to do the ^C, but I will ask.
> 
> We did the test with ^C and here is what we found.
> 
> For synchronous RPC task the signal was delivered to the RPC task and
> the task exit with -ERESTARTSYS from __rpc_execute as expected.
> 
> For asynchronous RPC task the process that invokes the RPC task to send
> the request detected the signal in rpc_wait_for_completion_task and exits
> with -ERESTARTSYS. However the async RPC was allowed to continue to run
> to completion. So if the async RPC task was retrying an operation and
> the NFS server was down, it will retry forever if this is a hard mount
> or until the NFS server comes back up.
> 
> The question for the list is should we propagate the signal to the async
> task via rpc_signal_task to stop its execution or just leave it alone as is.
> 
> -Dai
> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -Dai
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> ---
>>>> include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h | 3 +--
>>>> net/sunrpc/clnt.c            | 3 ---
>>>> net/sunrpc/sched.c           | 1 -
>>>> 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h
>>>> index b8ca3ecaf8d7..8ada7dc802d3 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h
>>>> @@ -90,8 +90,7 @@ struct rpc_task {
>>>> #endif
>>>>     unsigned char        tk_priority : 2,/* Task priority */
>>>>                 tk_garb_retry : 2,
>>>> -                tk_cred_retry : 2,
>>>> -                tk_rebind_retry : 2;
>>>> +                tk_cred_retry : 2;
>>>> };
>>>> 
>>>> typedef void            (*rpc_action)(struct rpc_task *);
>>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
>>>> index 0b0b9f1eed46..63b438d8564b 100644
>>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
>>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
>>>> @@ -2050,9 +2050,6 @@ call_bind_status(struct rpc_task *task)
>>>>             status = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>>             break;
>>>>         }
>>>> -        if (task->tk_rebind_retry == 0)
>>>> -            break;
>>>> -        task->tk_rebind_retry--;
>>>>         rpc_delay(task, 3*HZ);
>>>>         goto retry_timeout;
>>>>     case -ENOBUFS:
>>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/sched.c b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
>>>> index be587a308e05..c8321de341ee 100644
>>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/sched.c
>>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
>>>> @@ -817,7 +817,6 @@ rpc_init_task_statistics(struct rpc_task *task)
>>>>     /* Initialize retry counters */
>>>>     task->tk_garb_retry = 2;
>>>>     task->tk_cred_retry = 2;
>>>> -    task->tk_rebind_retry = 2;
>>>> 
>>>>     /* starting timestamp */
>>>>     task->tk_start = ktime_get();
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.9.5
>>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Chuck Lever

--
Chuck Lever



  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-16 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-08 18:45 [PATCH] SUNRPC: remove the maximum number of retries in call_bind_status Dai Ngo
2023-03-08 18:50 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-03-08 19:03   ` dai.ngo
2023-03-14 16:19     ` dai.ngo
2023-03-16 13:38       ` Chuck Lever III [this message]
2023-03-27 16:05         ` Fwd: " dai.ngo
2023-04-06 17:33       ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-06 18:10         ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-06 19:36           ` dai.ngo
2023-04-06 19:43             ` Chuck Lever III
2023-04-06 19:59               ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-06 20:58                 ` dai.ngo
2023-04-06 21:51                   ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-06 20:58               ` dai.ngo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ACE2DBA2-0F3D-47EF-9167-9D45F5BE57E5@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=helen.chao@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox