From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
To: shaobingqing <shaobingqing@bwstor.com.cn>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: don't update isize when NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITTING in nfs_update_inode
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:34:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C689DB34-AC0A-49CF-94DC-74ACB1CB177F@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389599759-2711-1-git-send-email-shaobingqing@bwstor.com.cn>
On Jan 13, 2014, at 2:55, shaobingqing <shaobingqing@bwstor.com.cn> wrote:
> When a file is in NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITING status, its isize perhaps has not been
> transferred to the metadate server. So the isize getting from the metadata server
> perhaps is out of date and cannot be used to update the isize of the client.
>
> Signed-off-by: shaobingqing <shaobingqing@bwstor.com.cn>
> ---
> fs/nfs/inode.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> index ebeb94c..caf50a1 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> @@ -1402,7 +1402,8 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> if (new_isize != cur_isize) {
> /* Do we perhaps have any outstanding writes, or has
> * the file grown beyond our last write? */
> - if ((nfsi->npages == 0 && !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->flags)) ||
> + if ((nfsi->npages == 0 && !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->flags) &&
> + !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITTING, &nfsi->flags)) ||
> new_isize > cur_isize) {
> i_size_write(inode, new_isize);
> invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA;
Ugh. Is there any reason why we can’t just keep NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT set until the layout commit operation is finished instead of multiplying the tests for it in generic NFS code paths such as nfs_update_inode?
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-13 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-13 7:55 [PATCH] nfs: don't update isize when NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITTING in nfs_update_inode shaobingqing
2014-01-13 13:34 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2014-01-13 16:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-01-13 18:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] NFSv4.1: Don't trust attributes if a pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT is outstanding Trond Myklebust
2014-01-13 18:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] NFSv4.1: Fix a race in nfs4_write_inode Trond Myklebust
2014-01-16 15:49 ` Peng Tao
2014-01-16 17:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-01-17 13:05 ` Peng Tao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C689DB34-AC0A-49CF-94DC-74ACB1CB177F@primarydata.com \
--to=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaobingqing@bwstor.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox