[GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client RDMA changes for 3.16

[GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client RDMA changes for 3.16

[Anna Schumaker]

Hey Trond,

The following changes since commit fad01e866afdbe01a1f3ec06a39c3a8b9e197014:

  Linux 3.15-rc8 (2014-06-01 19:12:24 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/anna/nfs-rdma.git nfs-rdma

for you to fetch changes up to dc7e3277e118e5bfd4796dc7cb386c1162c7c647:

  xprtrdma: Disconnect on registration failure (2014-06-02 14:09:00 -0400)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Allen Andrews (1):
      nfs-rdma: Fix for FMR leaks

Chuck Lever (21):
      xprtrdma: RPC/RDMA must invoke xprt_wake_pending_tasks() in process context
      xprtrdma: Remove BOUNCEBUFFERS memory registration mode
      xprtrdma: Remove MEMWINDOWS registration modes
      xprtrdma: Remove REGISTER memory registration mode
      xprtrdma: Fall back to MTHCAFMR when FRMR is not supported
      xprtrdma: mount reports "Invalid mount option" if memreg mode not supported
      xprtrdma: Simplify rpcrdma_deregister_external() synopsis
      xprtrdma: Make rpcrdma_ep_destroy() return void
      xprtrdma: Split the completion queue
      xprtrmda: Reduce lock contention in completion handlers
      xprtrmda: Reduce calls to ib_poll_cq() in completion handlers
      xprtrdma: Limit work done by completion handler
      xprtrdma: Reduce the number of hardway buffer allocations
      xprtrdma: Ensure ia->ri_id->qp is not NULL when reconnecting
      xprtrdma: Remove Tavor MTU setting
      xprtrdma: Use macros for reconnection timeout constants
      xprtrdma: Reset connection timeout after successful reconnect
      SUNRPC: Move congestion window constants to header file
      xprtrdma: Avoid deadlock when credit window is reset
      xprtrdma: Remove BUG_ON() call sites
      xprtrdma: Disconnect on registration failure

Shirley Ma (1):
      xprtrdma: Allocate missing pagelist

Steve Wise (1):
      xprtrdma: mind the device's max fast register page list depth

 include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h     |   6 ++
 net/sunrpc/xprt.c               |  28 +++------
 net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c  | 119 +++++++++++++++++---------------------
 net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c |  90 ++++++++++-------------------
 net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c     | 753 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h |  17 ++++--
 6 files changed, 411 insertions(+), 602 deletions(-)

Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client RDMA changes for 3.16

[Trond Myklebust]

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Anna Schumaker
<Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> wrote:
> Hey Trond,
>
> The following changes since commit fad01e866afdbe01a1f3ec06a39c3a8b9e197014:
>
>   Linux 3.15-rc8 (2014-06-01 19:12:24 -0700)
>

Did you rebase these? All the commits appear to be labeled with
today's date, and Chuck appears as the committer for all of them.

-- 
Trond Myklebust

Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData

trond.myklebust@primarydata.com

Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client RDMA changes for 3.16

[Anna Schumaker]

I pulled from Chuck's branch earlier today before sending this.  He has all the date stamps set as June 2.  

On 06/03/2014 12:44 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Anna Schumaker
> <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> wrote:
>> Hey Trond,
>>
>> The following changes since commit fad01e866afdbe01a1f3ec06a39c3a8b9e197014:
>>
>>   Linux 3.15-rc8 (2014-06-01 19:12:24 -0700)
>>
> 
> Did you rebase these? All the commits appear to be labeled with
> today's date, and Chuck appears as the committer for all of them.
> 

Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client RDMA changes for 3.16

[Trond Myklebust]

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Anna Schumaker
<Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> wrote:
> I pulled from Chuck's branch earlier today before sending this.  He has all the date stamps set as June 2.
>

OK, this is broken and I'm not pulling. The point of asking you to
maintain the tree was to ensure that the patches get reviewed by you,
and that I have signed-off-bys etc showing that is the case.


> On 06/03/2014 12:44 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Anna Schumaker
>> <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> wrote:
>>> Hey Trond,
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit fad01e866afdbe01a1f3ec06a39c3a8b9e197014:
>>>
>>>   Linux 3.15-rc8 (2014-06-01 19:12:24 -0700)
>>>
>>
>> Did you rebase these? All the commits appear to be labeled with
>> today's date, and Chuck appears as the committer for all of them.
>>
>



-- 
Trond Myklebust

Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData

trond.myklebust@primarydata.com

Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client RDMA changes for 3.16

[Shirley Ma]

On 06/03/2014 10:53 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Anna Schumaker
> <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> wrote:
>> I pulled from Chuck's branch earlier today before sending this.  He has all the date stamps set as June 2.
>>
> 
> OK, this is broken and I'm not pulling. The point of asking you to
> maintain the tree was to ensure that the patches get reviewed by you,
> and that I have signed-off-bys etc showing that is the case.

Thanks Trond for checking. Where was broken? What we can help here?

>> On 06/03/2014 12:44 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Anna Schumaker
>>> <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> wrote:
>>>> Hey Trond,
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit fad01e866afdbe01a1f3ec06a39c3a8b9e197014:
>>>>
>>>>   Linux 3.15-rc8 (2014-06-01 19:12:24 -0700)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Did you rebase these? All the commits appear to be labeled with
>>> today's date, and Chuck appears as the committer for all of them.
>>>
>>

Shirley
 

Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client RDMA changes for 3.16

[Trond Myklebust]

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Shirley Ma <shirley.ma@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/03/2014 10:53 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Anna Schumaker
>> <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> wrote:
>>> I pulled from Chuck's branch earlier today before sending this.  He has all the date stamps set as June 2.
>>>
>>
>> OK, this is broken and I'm not pulling. The point of asking you to
>> maintain the tree was to ensure that the patches get reviewed by you,
>> and that I have signed-off-bys etc showing that is the case.
>
> Thanks Trond for checking. Where was broken? What we can help here?

Hi Shirley,

I meant that the process was broken, since I was losing the
information about what Anna had reviewed and so the issue was how to
fix that. I've now talked to Chuck and Anna and we've set up a model
for how to work together in the future: the model I'd like to see is
for Anna to publish a branch of patches that she has reviewed, with
the signed-off-by line. That way I know that the contents are the
exact same patches that were approved on the mailing lists.

Cheers
  Trond

>>> On 06/03/2014 12:44 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Anna Schumaker
>>>> <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hey Trond,
>>>>>
>>>>> The following changes since commit fad01e866afdbe01a1f3ec06a39c3a8b9e197014:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Linux 3.15-rc8 (2014-06-01 19:12:24 -0700)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Did you rebase these? All the commits appear to be labeled with
>>>> today's date, and Chuck appears as the committer for all of them.
>>>>
>>>
>
> Shirley
>



-- 
Trond Myklebust

Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData

trond.myklebust@primarydata.com

Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client RDMA changes for 3.16

[Shirley Ma]

On 06/03/2014 04:07 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Hi Shirley,
> 
> I meant that the process was broken, since I was losing the
> information about what Anna had reviewed and so the issue was how to
> fix that. I've now talked to Chuck and Anna and we've set up a model
> for how to work together in the future: the model I'd like to see is
> for Anna to publish a branch of patches that she has reviewed, with
> the signed-off-by line. That way I know that the contents are the
> exact same patches that were approved on the mailing lists.
> 
> Cheers
>   Trond

Nice, thanks!

Shirley