From: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@primarydata.com>
Cc: linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: open_downgrade use
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:59:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN-5tyEdttEMqepHWmd-KgUcH-azbnko4QJsVuwQha=GSVgzoA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F693F912-2BA0-4899-A73C-65CB7536B090@primarydata.com>
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@primarydata.com> wrote:
> You are misreading what I wrote. Your test should indeed give rise to an
> OPEN_DOWNGRADE (unless there is a delegation involved). The code that was
> misbehaving and that was fixed by the patch was triggering an OPEN_DOWNGRADE
> from a stateid that had only been opened for RW.
I see. With this patch, the upstream code no longer sends an
OPEN_DOWNGRADE. I will investigate why then as it seems like a bug.
>
>
> On 6/1/16, 16:31, "linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org on behalf of Olga
> Kornievskaia" <linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org on behalf of aglo@umich.edu>
> wrote:
>
>>I'm failing to think of what can trigger an open_downgrade?
>>I thought the following example should trigger an open downgrade:
>>
>>fd0 = open(foo, RDRW) -- should be open on the wire for "both"
>>fd1 = open(foo, RDONLY) -- should be open on the wire for "read"
>>close(fd0) -- should trigger an open_downgrade
>>read(fd1)
>>close(fd1)
>>
>>However this commit says that it's not allowed by the spec.
>>
>>commit cd9288ffaea4359d5cfe2b8d264911506aed26a4
>>Author: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
>>Date: Thu Sep 18 11:51:32 2014 -0400
>>
>> NFSv4: Fix another bug in the close/open_downgrade code
>>
>> James Drew reports another bug whereby the NFS client is now sending
>> an OPEN_DOWNGRADE in a situation where it should really have sent a
>> CLOSE: the client is opening the file for O_RDWR, but then trying to
>> do a downgrade to O_RDONLY, which is not allowed by the NFSv4 spec.
>>
>> Reported-by: James Drews <drews@engr.wisc.edu>
>> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/541AD7E5.8020409@engr.wisc.edu
>> Fixes: aee7af356e15 (NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence...)
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
>> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
>>
>>If RDWR to RDONLY isn't allowed then why do we have OPEN_DOWNGRADE at all?
>>--
>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
> Disclaimer
>
> The information contained in this communication from the sender is
> confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others
> authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in
> relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
> be unlawful.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-01 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-01 20:31 open_downgrade use Olga Kornievskaia
2016-06-01 20:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-01 20:59 ` Olga Kornievskaia [this message]
2016-06-01 22:10 ` Frank Filz
2016-06-02 19:48 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2016-06-07 14:26 ` Olga Kornievskaia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAN-5tyEdttEMqepHWmd-KgUcH-azbnko4QJsVuwQha=GSVgzoA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=aglo@umich.edu \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).