From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB4681FDA61 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741954720; cv=none; b=KlqGH2YEVbAhn2CVNlHmEEbIr8brLFG14L5AbW1vDYNH9W7xrueMCh4yvXJ3o0xWG/E8LShIQ6WVodSko/KK0k9NVAUrYjfG7ny52YYm5/9FLoXe8NqmBRLmr0fLWFJeOAcBOVu+cNJM8cJXdK1r3ltvIEIJCmJHunz8wbtw6eA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741954720; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z+b0qSUp3qEAUrGMqSh97WV3PdLM6+lRWDdKYyKYkGw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=flwEkX8M4Xs8vVk9/qhFVar3ErKU6YXO/AwQ1OsftXaMmo9+9gc5paodBzmeBTgcoHSO5o29iRyLdnp9X4fgEz7Me8wcQy18yircOVak3KuzRsopkZ5bj6FzXi2ijHvg6u1SHY4XBuRZGa7B8PdF/TuHQQjgE2Qku99nNar2WUk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=UOQ9X6YZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="UOQ9X6YZ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1741954716; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ObU7/ql0kvXDnQRDU7S9QZljpE3OrC3UO7VldJ5p95M=; b=UOQ9X6YZ0W6jgHNRyuQvOXxTm8AkB15PQpjPOBXF50Q6KWwRX5Mds7PPLQTcKrJO0ACMDi SILn1gISqk/zxkHlr+m0Vj8JpwPV95VzWujYzX178Wnfa+xjCiXn/DJGLHm3QSCk+26IZt VVT7cc+mlyEFpiMTV9W9PCY3Zh6MzoM= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-693-E7x32_0XN2GQzIWuAqopDg-1; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 08:18:32 -0400 X-MC-Unique: E7x32_0XN2GQzIWuAqopDg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: E7x32_0XN2GQzIWuAqopDg_1741954711 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D84180882E; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.37.1] (unknown [10.22.58.9]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C53B81955F2D; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:18:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Benjamin Coddington To: "Andrew J. Romero" , Steved Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GSSPROXY ( for NFS with sec=krb5, krb5i , krb5p ) is development still active or is it being depreciated Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 08:18:28 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 On 13 Mar 2025, at 7:30, Andrew J. Romero wrote: > Hi > > Alexander Bokovoy provided excellent answers to most of my questions on > this topic See: Thread: gssproxy security, configuration and life-cycle > questions on gss-proxy@lists.fedorahosted.org > > Remaining question: > > Prior to RHEL-9 , in the section of the gssd man page ( under the heading > CONFIGURATION FILE ... ....options that can be set on the command line > can also be controlled through .... values set in the [gssd] section of > /etc/nfs.conf ) there was a configuration parameter "use-gss-proxy" I don't see any git history of gssd.man with use-gss-proxy, but the value does appear in nfs.conf.man. It has not been removed there. It probably should be added to gssd.man. > why was this parameter removed from the current man page, can it be > re-added ? ( apparently the parameter is still functional ... if that's > the case , it should not simply be removed from the documentation with no > commentary ) I'm not sure thats what happened. It looks like it wasn't ever in gssd.man to me. Maybe Steve D can clarify? Ben