From: "Björn JACKE" <bj@SerNet.DE>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
sfrench@us.ibm.com, agruen@linbit.com, dilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
sandeen@redhat.com, bfields@fieldses.org, jlayton@redhat.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V5 00/24] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 00:16:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1QKJAl-00DGc7-EB@intern.SerNet.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110228211145.GG28617@thunk.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 637 bytes --]
Hi,
On 2011-02-28 at 16:11 -0500 Ted Ts'o sent off:
> What is the current status of this patch series? I seem to remember
> that Christoph and Al Viro had some objections; have those been
> cleared yet? If not, can you summarize what their objections are?
>
> To be honest I haven't been paying super close attention to this patch
> series, and I'm curious what needs to happen with it one way or
> another.
after the discussion of this path submission thread are there any major or
minor issues left that prevent these to go upstream? I'd really love to see
NFSv4 ACLs being available on Linux, too.
Cheers
Björn
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-11 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-23 13:51 [PATCH -V5 00/24] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 01/24] vfs: Indicate that the permission functions take all the MAY_* flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 02/24] vfs: Pass all mask flags down to iop->check_acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 03/24] vfs: Add a comment to inode_permission() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 04/24] vfs: Add generic IS_ACL() test for acl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 05/24] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 06/24] vfs: Optimize out IS_RICHACL() if CONFIG_FS_RICHACL is not defined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 07/24] vfs: Add new file and directory create permission flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 08/24] vfs: Add delete child and delete self " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 09/24] vfs: Make the inode passed to inode_change_ok non-const Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 10/24] vfs: Add permission flags for setting file attributes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 11/24] vfs: Make acl_permission_check() work for richacls Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 12/24] richacl: In-memory representation and helper functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 13/24] richacl: Permission mapping functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 14/24] richacl: Compute maximum file masks from an acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 15/24] richacl: Update the file masks in chmod() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 16/24] richacl: Permission check algorithm Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 17/24] richacl: Create-time inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 18/24] richacl: Check if an acl is equivalent to a file mode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 19/24] richacl: Automatic Inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 20/24] richacl: xattr mapping functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 21/24] ext4: Use IS_POSIXACL() to check for POSIX ACL support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 22/24] vfs: Cache richacl in struct inode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 23/24] ext4: Implement rich acl for ext4 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 24/24] ext4: Add temporary richacl mount option " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-28 21:11 ` [PATCH -V5 00/24] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Ted Ts'o
2011-03-01 6:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2011-03-02 15:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-02 17:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2011-03-02 18:58 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-04 10:38 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2011-03-05 0:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-05 17:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2011-03-15 8:46 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-05-11 22:16 ` Björn JACKE [this message]
[not found] ` <E1QKJAl-00DGc7-EB-dqLtpHMqGvUyWpdLl23E4A@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-13 15:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-05-13 15:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1QKJAl-00DGc7-EB@intern.SerNet.DE \
--to=bj@sernet.de \
--cc=agruen@linbit.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=dilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sfrench@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).