From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC][PATCH v2 9/9] nfs: Use TST_ALL_FILESYSTEMS=1
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 08:51:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqrS7K3l3b3Vp+ys@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2dViRNFsreFRyyTtPECdVEyaAEE0CuYBmZrwor=rgi=mQ@mail.gmail.com>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 5:44 AM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> > ---
> > Hi NFS developers,
> > your comments are welcome. This is an effort how to support NFS tests on
> > all filesystems available on SUT. Using $TST_MNTPOINT means test run in
> > loop, each time different filesystem is used. It's implemented via
> > formatted loop device (the same way as in LTP C API).
> > Code is also at:
> > https://github.com/pevik/ltp/tree/shell/all_filesystems.v2
> > But this requires restarting NFS server (otherwise legacy
> > testcases/lib/daemonlib.sh
> > would have to be used), which is IMHO not optimal.
> > Without that (or only run 'systemctl reload nfs-server' or exportfs -r
> > on remote side) it cannot be umounted after testing - debugging with
> > fuser, code at:
> > https://github.com/pevik/ltp/commit/3656d035d43445a107154ef397ef1db2fad2c4f0
> > The problem is that loop device is still referenced by nfs server and
> > thus cannot be unmounted. Can this be somehow fixed? Is it even wanted
> > to have tests on loop device (the only reasonable way to support more
> > filesystems)? Also tests will run much longer (we could filter out some
> > filesystems not supported, if there are any).
> > # LTP_SINGLE_FS_TYPE=ext2 PATH="/opt/ltp/testcases/bin:$PATH" nfs07.sh -v
> > 3 -t tcp -i3
> > ## NOTE: testing itself is OK
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: initialize 'lhost' 'ltp_ns_veth2' interface
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: add local addr 10.0.0.2/24
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: add local addr fd00:1:1:1::2/64
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: initialize 'rhost' 'ltp_ns_veth1' interface
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: add remote addr 10.0.0.1/24
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: add remote addr fd00:1:1:1::1/64
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: Network config (local -- remote):
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: ltp_ns_veth2 -- ltp_ns_veth1
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: 10.0.0.2/24 -- 10.0.0.1/24
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: fd00:1:1:1::2/64 -- fd00:1:1:1::1/64
> > tst_device.c:89: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0'
> > tst_supported_fs_types.c:148: TINFO: WARNING: testing only ext2
> > tst_supported_fs_types.c:89: TINFO: Kernel supports ext2
> > tst_supported_fs_types.c:51: TINFO: mkfs.ext2 does exist
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: Testing on ext2
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: Formatting ext2 with opts='/dev/loop0'
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 5m 0s
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: mount.nfs: (linux nfs-utils 2.6.1)
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: setup NFSv3, socket type tcp
> > nfs07 1 TINFO: Mounting NFS: mount -v -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=3 10.0.0.2:/tmp/LTP_nfs07.A3PIB82iUv/mntpoint/3/tcp
> > /tmp/LTP_nfs07.A3PIB82iUv/mntpoint/3/0
> > nfs07 1 TPASS: All files and directories were correctly listed
> > nfs07 2 TPASS: All files and directories were correctly listed
> > nfs07 3 TPASS: All files and directories were correctly listed
> > nfs07 4 TINFO: Cleaning up testcase
> > ## DEBUGGING CODE in nfs_cleanup()
> > nfs07 4 TINFO: fuser -mv /tmp/LTP_nfs07.P1XS9smc5w ($TST_TMPDIR)
> > USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
> > /tmp/LTP_nfs07.P1XS9smc5w:
> > root kernel mount /tmp
> > root 2125 ..c.. tst_timeout_kil
> > nfs07 4 TINFO: fuser -mv /tmp/LTP_nfs07.P1XS9smc5w/mntpoint ($TST_MNTPOINT)
> > USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
> > /tmp/LTP_nfs07.P1XS9smc5w/mntpoint:
> > root kernel mount
> > /tmp/LTP_nfs07.P1XS9smc5w/mntpoint
> > nfs07 4 TINFO: fuser -mv /tmp/LTP_nfs07.P1XS9smc5w/mntpoint/3/0
> > USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
> > /tmp/LTP_nfs07.P1XS9smc5w/mntpoint/3/0:
> > root kernel mount
> > /tmp/LTP_nfs07.P1XS9smc5w/mntpoint/3/0
> > ## from nfs_cleanup()
> > ## grep -q "$local_dir" /proc/mounts && umount $local_dir
> > nfs07 4 TINFO: umount /tmp/LTP_nfs07.P1XS9smc5w/mntpoint/3/0
> > umount: /tmp/LTP_nfs07.P1XS9smc5w/mntpoint: target is busy.
> Maybe try with `umount -fl`?
Thank you! Unfortunately it does not work (I tried this before ending up with
restarting server because even -fl did not help).
I also consider the need of 'umount -fl' as kind of error just less aggressive
then restarting server. But if this is considered ok, why not.
Kind regards,
Petr
> unmount manual says:
> -f, --force force unmount (in case of an unreachable NFS system)
> -l, --lazy detach the filesystem now, clean up things later
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-16 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-09 21:42 [PATCH 0/9] shell: nfs: $TST_ALL_FILESYSTEMS (.all_filesystems) Petr Vorel
2022-06-09 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] tst_test.sh: Add $TST_MOUNT_DEVICE Petr Vorel
2022-06-09 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] df01.sh: Use TST_MOUNT_DEVICE=1 Petr Vorel
2022-06-09 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] tst_test.sh: allow ' in pattern for allowed variables Petr Vorel
2022-06-17 11:59 ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2022-06-09 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] shell: Add test for TST_MOUNT_DEVICE=1 Petr Vorel
2022-07-11 15:02 ` Petr Vorel
2022-06-09 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] tst_test.sh: Add $TST_ALL_FILESYSTEMS Petr Vorel
2022-06-17 13:52 ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2022-06-17 14:07 ` Petr Vorel
2022-08-04 7:07 ` Petr Vorel
2022-06-09 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] tst_device: Remove unnecessary braces Petr Vorel
2022-06-17 13:57 ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2022-06-09 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] tst_device: Add clear command Petr Vorel
2022-06-17 14:02 ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2022-06-09 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] shell: Add test for TST_ALL_FILESYSTEMS=1 Petr Vorel
2022-06-09 21:42 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 9/9] nfs: Use TST_ALL_FILESYSTEMS=1 Petr Vorel
[not found] ` <CAEemH2dViRNFsreFRyyTtPECdVEyaAEE0CuYBmZrwor=rgi=mQ@mail.gmail.com>
2022-06-16 6:51 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2022-06-17 14:51 ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2022-07-11 15:08 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqrS7K3l3b3Vp+ys@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox