From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RDMA/core: Fix check_flush_dependency splat on addr_wq
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:20:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwXtePKW+sn/89M6@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <584E7212-BC09-48E1-A27E-725E54FA075E@oracle.com>
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 01:58:44PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 23, 2022, at 4:09 AM, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:30:20AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
<...>
> >> The xprtiod work queue is WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, so any work queue that
> >> one of its work items tries to cancel has to be WQ_MEM_RECLAIM to
> >> prevent a priority inversion.
> >
> > But why do you have WQ_MEM_RECLAIM in xprtiod?
>
> Because RPC is under a filesystem (NFS). Therefore it has to handle
> writeback demanded by direct reclaim. All of the storage ULPs have
> this constraint, in fact.
I don't know, this ib_addr workqueue is used when connection is created.
Jason, what do you think?
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-24 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-22 15:30 [PATCH v1] RDMA/core: Fix check_flush_dependency splat on addr_wq Chuck Lever
2022-08-23 8:09 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-23 13:58 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-08-24 9:20 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-08-24 14:09 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-08-26 13:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-26 14:02 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-08-26 14:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-26 19:57 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-08-29 16:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-29 17:14 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-08-29 17:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-29 18:15 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-08-29 18:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-29 19:31 ` Chuck Lever III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwXtePKW+sn/89M6@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox