From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E6AECAAD8 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 17:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231874AbiIMRIM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 13:08:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39122 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231980AbiIMRHq (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 13:07:46 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2605F90C42 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 08:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C471734C42; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:56:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1663084617; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kM3oceWYTwXTJ87wjVgDRLcrCQPzSh85+zwy7HneCf4=; b=m33h3znXFM9TSHWseB0uxOW2zHuQJsOzS1fSH6vKaCeRz+EK5OOFYM1/ykhHXvA9U0+252 P2hx6xhsK64Dn16gbPCkH8BRKbaZD3T7+B7feSnB7ldjVuV5CAKKr6Tmvv1KVXh1lg4bXE 6xuR0TnaUzy23xthu0yjYMCiy3Pqu+E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1663084617; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kM3oceWYTwXTJ87wjVgDRLcrCQPzSh85+zwy7HneCf4=; b=UwJ9mJjToZcLkvzIg28jeXFQWrXWklE9qJh5FNdjqtfMNPKHCicm0CZMOpKW1IyfQagNfM VEVq0ZdA8EaIDdCQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 977D6139B3; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id qwwZIkmoIGNlYgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:56:57 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 17:56:55 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Steve Dickson Cc: Giulio Benetti , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nfsrahead: fix linking while static linking Message-ID: Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: <881E6E82-812C-4BD8-849C-4DEE484AE4F0@benettiengineering.com> <12ece17b-b2d9-6621-0af7-26a12470bc99@redhat.com> <21969dec-4bbe-94ae-b317-1bc12300d6ca@benettiengineering.com> <42980d60-3b6d-4479-8c1a-a5fd7ba30f4c@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <42980d60-3b6d-4479-8c1a-a5fd7ba30f4c@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org > On 8/22/22 4:33 PM, Giulio Benetti wrote: > > Hi Steve, Petr, > > On 22/08/22 21:17, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > On 8/11/22 4:36 PM, Giulio Benetti wrote: > > > > Hi Petr, > > > > > Il giorno 11 ago 2022, alle ore 22:20, Petr Vorel > > > > > ha scritto: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > > > > > nit (not worth of reposting): I'm not a native speaker, but > > > > > IMHO subject should > > > > > be without while, e.g. "fix order on static linking" > > > > Totally, it sounds awful as it is now. > > > > I ask maintainers if it’s possible to reword like Petr > > > > pointed. > > > Will do! > > Thank you! > > I will try to improve the pkg-config autotools because as it is now it > > works but it’s not a good solution. > > I should use what it’s been suggested to me here: > > https://lists.buildroot.org/pipermail/buildroot/2022-August/648926.html > > And I’ve given another solution: > > https://lists.buildroot.org/pipermail/buildroot/2022-August/648933.html > > but it’s still not ok: > > https://lists.buildroot.org/pipermail/buildroot/2022-August/649058.html > I don't have access to those list... Yep, these are forbidden 403. Giulio, please post a link on lore https://lore.kernel.org/buildroot/ (or on patchwork) Kind regards, Petr > > So for the moment it’s a decent solution indeed it’s been committed to > > Buildroot > > but I’ll try to improve it once I’ll have time. > Sounds like a plan... > steved. > > Kind regards > > — > > Giulio Benetti > > CEO/CTO@Benetti Engineering sas > > > steved. > > > > Thank you all. > > > > Best regards > > > > Giulio > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Petr