From: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>,
Yongcheng Yang <yoyang@redhat.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] nfsdctl: add support for new lockd configuration interface
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:44:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4fJz4re4iFyM2FE@aion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <659d6f0153daf83ebfcad8d7bdb80adb6aa319b5.camel@kernel.org>
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-01-14 at 16:09 -0500, Scott Mayhew wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jan 2025, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >
> > > v2 is just a small update to fix the problems that Scott spotted.
> > >
> > > This patch series adds support for the new lockd configuration interface
> > > that should fix this RH bug:
> > >
> > > https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-71698
> > >
> > > There are some other improvements here too, notably a switch to xlog.
> > > Only lightly tested, but seems to do the right thing.
> > >
> > > Port handling with lockd still needs more work. Currently that is
> > > usually configured by rpc.statd. I think we need to convert it to
> > > use netlink to configure the ports as well, when it's able.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> >
> > I think the read_nfsd_conf call should be moved out of autostart_func
> > and into main (right before the command-line options are parsed). Right
> > now if you enable debugging in nfs.conf, you get the "configuring
> > listeners" and "nfsdctl exiting" messages, but not the "nfsdctl started"
> > message. It's not a big deal though and could be done if additional
> > debug logging is added in the future.
> >
>
> That sounds good. We can do that in a separate patch.
>
> > Reviewed-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks!
Hey, Jeff. I was testing this against a kernel without the lockd
netlink patch, and I get this:
Jan 15 09:39:16 systemd[1]: Starting nfs-server.service - NFS server and services...
Jan 15 09:39:17 sh[1603]: nfsdctl: nfsdctl started
Jan 15 09:39:17 sh[1603]: nfsdctl: nfsd not found
Jan 15 09:39:17 sh[1603]: nfsdctl: lockd configuration failure
Jan 15 09:39:17 sh[1603]: nfsdctl: nfsdctl exiting
Jan 15 09:39:17 sh[1601]: rpc.nfsd: knfsd is currently down
Jan 15 09:39:17 sh[1601]: rpc.nfsd: Writing version string to kernel: -2 +3 +4 +4.1 +4.2
Jan 15 09:39:17 sh[1601]: rpc.nfsd: Created AF_INET TCP socket.
Jan 15 09:39:17 sh[1601]: rpc.nfsd: Created AF_INET6 TCP socket.
Do we really want it falling back to rpc.nfsd if it can't configure
lockd? Maybe it should emit a warning instead?
At the very least, NFSD_FAMILY_NAME should no longer be hard-coded in
that "not found" error message in netlink_msg_alloc().
-Scott
>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - properly regenerate manpages
> > > - fix up bogus merge conflict
> > > - add D_GENERAL xlog messages when nfsdctl starts and exits
> > > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109-lockd-nl-v1-0-108548ab0b6b@kernel.org
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Jeff Layton (3):
> > > nfsdctl: convert to xlog()
> > > nfsdctl: fix the --version option
> > > nfsdctl: add necessary bits to configure lockd
> > >
> > > configure.ac | 4 +
> > > utils/nfsdctl/lockd_netlink.h | 29 ++++
> > > utils/nfsdctl/nfsdctl.8 | 15 +-
> > > utils/nfsdctl/nfsdctl.adoc | 8 +
> > > utils/nfsdctl/nfsdctl.c | 331 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > 5 files changed, 321 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> > > ---
> > > base-commit: 65f4cc3a6ce1472ee4092c4bbf4b19beb0a8217b
> > > change-id: 20250109-lockd-nl-6272fa9e8a5d
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > --
> > > Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-10 13:46 [PATCH v2 0/3] nfsdctl: add support for new lockd configuration interface Jeff Layton
2025-01-10 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] nfsdctl: convert to xlog() Jeff Layton
2025-01-10 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] nfsdctl: fix the --version option Jeff Layton
2025-01-10 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] nfsdctl: add necessary bits to configure lockd Jeff Layton
2025-01-10 15:05 ` Tom Talpey
2025-01-10 15:21 ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-10 15:40 ` Tom Talpey
2025-01-13 13:39 ` Benjamin Coddington
2025-01-14 15:53 ` Tom Talpey
2025-01-14 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] nfsdctl: add support for new lockd configuration interface Scott Mayhew
2025-01-14 21:18 ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-15 14:44 ` Scott Mayhew [this message]
2025-01-15 14:56 ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-15 15:12 ` Steve Dickson
2025-01-15 15:28 ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-15 16:40 ` Scott Mayhew
2025-01-15 17:00 ` [nfs-utils PATCH] nfsdctl: debug logging fixups Scott Mayhew
2025-01-15 17:02 ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-15 17:32 ` Steve Dickson
2025-01-15 17:35 ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-15 17:47 ` Steve Dickson
2025-01-15 18:33 ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-15 20:53 ` Steve Dickson
2025-01-16 11:50 ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-16 21:00 ` Steve Dickson
2025-01-16 21:12 ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-19 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] nfsdctl: add support for new lockd configuration interface Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4fJz4re4iFyM2FE@aion \
--to=smayhew@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=yoyang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox