From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298771990BA for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741963548; cv=none; b=Fo5wBuQPygXNuCcQ2Vk78gvXRxNs1ZUw1H3OeneWhPodFOShgMiTxHaUv7CwVQi7Iii9jL7rDHKPm5Zr8GzSvTc3tMjv9xuxAl5MoozduH6dUV4e6RzNlNgn/LRYB1buIBZZAklzVe7/92Xjx4jhBnvIcDG/8VnJ9pwbZxm8cmA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741963548; c=relaxed/simple; bh=93D7l1cxQrjBUqLysHtj812PCh2yyOQSETd91fEGCjU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UoK1DpYSUxCseT3SX6Y1lznU8OGHktkyOu45xYX+IZp3cvCC/uYUbJD2z+Ac9FGRNgAMcGv+NVI4PfmX1X5vylIYkeZGBRgDP4YvGW9PyIlUI5yLJkaUzLx03eO7Rox9E8MfnIiPsna6TNSW7+aus9bUW94XcMLa5TGauv1MP0Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=HBGVceo5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="HBGVceo5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1741963546; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vl0X1Jbbb97TugQoVJnDL5BKnzsdhn9OTbk4HKhMkFo=; b=HBGVceo5rW7eAkt53PqTroeIonXYxSIveeyMY1KTDAccEfT19EnisZ99h1Bel49AUPV4Db GHjEkfq7zgcHLBpVSeMPiwnPU//dMIeYEQHvsP3sGI2K76j1ao95W0vSibWMQYvgaMpVqm v3S5pUN7Lja9oEdOVzK8sLGun+VQHGs= Received: from mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-578-9JJn4JEcOiOtX9H3RROlrw-1; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:45:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 9JJn4JEcOiOtX9H3RROlrw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 9JJn4JEcOiOtX9H3RROlrw_1741963540 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86B691955E92; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aion.redhat.com (unknown [10.22.80.106]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A3351828A98; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by aion.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B98F3338FFE; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:45:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:45:38 -0400 From: Scott Mayhew To: Benjamin Coddington Cc: "Andrew J. Romero" , Steved , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GSSPROXY ( for NFS with sec=krb5, krb5i , krb5p ) is development still active or is it being depreciated Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 On Fri, 14 Mar 2025, Benjamin Coddington wrote: > On 13 Mar 2025, at 7:30, Andrew J. Romero wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Alexander Bokovoy provided excellent answers to most of my questions on > > this topic See: Thread: gssproxy security, configuration and life-cycle > > questions on gss-proxy@lists.fedorahosted.org > > > > Remaining question: > > > > Prior to RHEL-9 , in the section of the gssd man page ( under the heading > > CONFIGURATION FILE ... ....options that can be set on the command line > > can also be controlled through .... values set in the [gssd] section of > > /etc/nfs.conf ) there was a configuration parameter "use-gss-proxy" > > I don't see any git history of gssd.man with use-gss-proxy, but the value > does appear in nfs.conf.man. It has not been removed there. It probably > should be added to gssd.man. I also looked at the repos we use to build the RHEL packages, and I don't see any evidence that we ever shipped a RHEL-only patch that would have documented use-gss-proxy in gssd.man. Andrew - can you provide a specific RHEL package version where you saw this documented in gssd.man (on the off change I missed something)? Either way, I agree this should be documented. -Scott > > > why was this parameter removed from the current man page, can it be > > re-added ? ( apparently the parameter is still functional ... if that's > > the case , it should not simply be removed from the documentation with no > > commentary ) > > I'm not sure thats what happened. It looks like it wasn't ever in gssd.man > to me. Maybe Steve D can clarify? > > Ben > >