From: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
To: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [nfs-utils PATCH 0/2] gssd: improve interoperability with NFS servers that don't have support for the newest encryption types
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 08:30:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zeced5frADc9oA0G@aion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZeYHMYoVglzPreL1@aion>
Re-adding the list.
On Mon, 04 Mar 2024, Scott Mayhew wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2024, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 5:23 PM Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In order for an NFS client with support for the newer encryption types
> > > (AES with SHA2 and Camellia) in its RPCSEC GSS kernel code to connect to
> > > an NFS server without support for those encryption types in its RPCSEC
> > > GSS kernel code, it is sometimes necessary for configuration changes on
> > > the NFS server... particularly if the NFS server's userspace krb5 code
> > > does have support for the newer encryption types and/or the NFS server's
> > > keytab has "nfs" keys using the newer encryption types.
> >
> > I'm stuck on "the NFs server's keytab has nfs keys" with newer
> > encryption types. That sounds like a misconfigured server. The
> > administrator shouldn't have issued a keytab knowingly that those
> > encryption types are not supported.
>
> I think it's probably pretty common for administrators to omit the -e
> option when they use 'kadmin ktadd' or 'ipa-getkeytab', so they get keys
> for whatever's enabled in their krb5 configuration.
>
> But It turns out that part is not even necessary for the problem to occur.
> As long as the krb5 configuration has those encryption types enabled, the
> problem can occur. See the thread posted by Orion Poplawski on 2/29:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/181e6547-a0ec-4c02-844b-bf1eda464acd@nwra.com/T/#t
>
> -Scott
> >
> > > Rather than
> > > rehashing the whole discussion here in the cover letter, see the
> > > description in the first patch for the gory details.
> > >
> > > These patches make it easier for a "newer" NFS client to work with an
> > > "older" NFS server.
> > >
> > > The first patch adds support for an "allowed-enctypes" option in
> > > nfs.conf, allowing the the client to restrict the permitted encryption
> > > types to a subset of what is otherwise supported in its krb5 environment
> > > so that it doesn't use an encryption type that the NFS server doesn't
> > > support when negotiating a GSS context.
> > >
> > > The second patch builds on this by adding an automatic backoff feature,
> > > where if the NFS client fails to negotiate a GSS context with the NFS
> > > server using the newer encryption types, it will try again without using
> > > the newer encryption types.
> > >
> > > With these patches in place on the NFS client, the "newer" NFS client
> > > will work with an "older" NFS server without requiring any configuration
> > > changes.
> > >
> > > Scott Mayhew (2):
> > > gssd: add support for an "allowed-enctypes" option in nfs.conf
> > > gssd: add a "backoff" feature to limit_krb5_enctypes()
> > >
> > > nfs.conf | 1 +
> > > utils/gssd/gssd.c | 6 ++
> > > utils/gssd/gssd.man | 9 +++
> > > utils/gssd/gssd_proc.c | 15 ++++-
> > > utils/gssd/krb5_util.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > utils/gssd/krb5_util.h | 3 +-
> > > 6 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
> > >
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-05 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-28 22:22 [nfs-utils PATCH 0/2] gssd: improve interoperability with NFS servers that don't have support for the newest encryption types Scott Mayhew
2024-02-28 22:22 ` [nfs-utils PATCH 1/2] gssd: add support for an "allowed-enctypes" option in nfs.conf Scott Mayhew
2024-03-15 13:13 ` Steve Dickson
2024-02-28 22:22 ` [nfs-utils PATCH 2/2] gssd: add a "backoff" feature to limit_krb5_enctypes() Scott Mayhew
[not found] ` <CAN-5tyHaP9OXNPJ2ZX=M7ktqLgfXZttk+zym5-DYzi6+vv_B5g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <ZeYHp8BygJQDkrv1@aion>
2024-03-05 13:30 ` Scott Mayhew
2024-03-15 13:13 ` Steve Dickson
[not found] ` <CAN-5tyFUXLrRLXiFmiN0X3fOAS4UBR+5Uo1XrN1sApD5K3W3wg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <ZeYHMYoVglzPreL1@aion>
2024-03-05 13:30 ` Scott Mayhew [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zeced5frADc9oA0G@aion \
--to=smayhew@redhat.com \
--cc=aglo@umich.edu \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).