From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DC0B31A89 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 08:52:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719996756; cv=none; b=q5+FStgLjZLEMZZ58EHQ1eNp+HQcjMxOWBO433FkSetWpIV6b2T6pmZSvNIcu/J61pVxXD0Uiy8vugKpmsjRq7/zIn6N890mAVc5Aso2ZAxmBULbwDG0igUvN0GLLlpZTx+UUMBbQkOVD2OBJpdWBC5rOwBBg2w0JLGh2gPfSl4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719996756; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dSGXWsZvj9phGtk4W1e/pMfjlX2M78IPXhIIT64anlY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=vEYJDTx20Jn9/QKcYBoHIF6tCzF7c4r0cbUMKz3BqNIqQxMCJ+iOzNS9v0GvtexFEj8srt/ULrKOc0Lka59xuEWePWObLWhBXPyzzr2wkzCs7MXBPs+cUOZdHgHU1XIiPalTNEw2op5g3tjOH8hy1yWrBC9I25LuWosjpTtdTFU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tXSOpesf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tXSOpesf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 851FBC2BD10; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 08:52:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719996755; bh=dSGXWsZvj9phGtk4W1e/pMfjlX2M78IPXhIIT64anlY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tXSOpesf4nShp0El4zoGlWiz0qjEPw5CKvt8mduZkqViBLYYoXXN9kdxMCQpW1jfF +3CmboNTlYAIi6jZFZDwwh4ZWa/MC1A0koNLNT59fPJZvi3WZQQ19UbCt1Dqa4pqz0 4CmyCxI9h8iq8hL2zSwTSxBGgwWsJ6KrmEJj+v/V5EoxGNU2s+FGU8sglHipjbqpH4 EMElIH2HfkH5Xl+mogV84+8lkRfaOh0Jr0ETIwscrXk3aywPX9MYN+egnwGHKESYsm f+wfhkidMbrGcffw5RoHDL5i9WwlVpTQ6YEyjzRscUyP5hCFh5Bjft2Is5YCiI8qLz zUk3nNf4nsquw== Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 04:52:34 -0400 From: Mike Snitzer To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Chuck Lever III , Linux NFS Mailing List , Jeff Layton , Anna Schumaker , Trond Myklebust , Neil Brown , Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/20] nfs/nfsd: add support for localio Message-ID: References: <20240702162831.91604-1-snitzer@kernel.org> <3A583EDC-519C-4820-87E9-F4DC164656DB@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 10:04:56PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 06:06:09PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote: > > To make it official, for v11 of this series: > > > > Nacked-by: Chuck Lever > > We've also not even looked into tackling the whole memory reclaim > recursion problem that have historically made local loopback > network file system an unsupported configuration. We've have an > ongoing discussion on the XFS list that really needs to to fsdevel > and mm to make any progress first. I see absolutely not chance to > solved that in this merge window. I'm also a bit surprised and > shocked by the rush here. linux-nfs and linu-xfs both received those emails, there isn't some secret game here: https://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=171976530216518&w=2 https://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs&m=171976530416523&w=2 I pivoted away from that (after Dave's helpful response) and back to what I provided in most every revision of this patchset (with different header and code revisions), most recent being patch 18 of this v11 series: https://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=171993773109538&w=2 And if spending the past 2 months discussing and developing in the open is rushing things, I clearly need to slow down... If only I had reason to think others were considering merging these changes: https://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=171942776105165&w=2 Ultimately I simply wanted to keep momentum up, I'm sure you can relate to having a vision for phasing changes in without missing a cycle. But happy to just continue working it into the 6.12 development window. I'll be sure to cc linux-fsdevel on future revision(s).