From: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] nfs(5): Document the new "xprtsec=" mount option
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 14:07:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6e861a1-1609-11fc-219c-88dd8d90b526@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168935977873.1850.8214830433103692090.stgit@bazille.1015granger.net>
Hey!
On 7/14/23 2:36 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>
> More information about RPC-with-TLS and some brief set-up guidance
> are to be provided in a separate man page in Section 7.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Question: commit b5e4539f already add this RPC-with-TLS
update to the man page. So do you want me to revert b5e4539f
and replace it with this patch?
steved.
> ---
> utils/mount/nfs.man | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/utils/mount/nfs.man b/utils/mount/nfs.man
> index d9f34df36b42..dfc31a5dad26 100644
> --- a/utils/mount/nfs.man
> +++ b/utils/mount/nfs.man
> @@ -574,7 +574,43 @@ The
> .B sloppy
> option is an alternative to specifying
> .BR mount.nfs " -s " option.
> -
> +.TP 1.5i
> +.BI xprtsec= policy
> +Specifies the use of transport layer security to protect NFS network
> +traffic on behalf of this mount point.
> +.I policy
> +can be one of
> +.BR none ,
> +.BR tls ,
> +or
> +.BR mtls .
> +.IP
> +If
> +.B none
> +is specified,
> +transport layer security is forced off, even if the NFS server supports
> +transport layer security.
> +If
> +.B tls
> +is specified, the client uses RPC-with-TLS to provide in-transit
> +confidentiality.
> +If
> +.B mtls
> +is specified, the client uses RPC-with-TLS to authenticate itself and
> +to provide in-transit confidentiality.
> +If either
> +.B tls
> +or
> +.B mtls
> +is specified and the server does not support RPC-with-TLS or peer
> +authentication fails, the mount attempt fails.
> +.IP
> +If the
> +.B xprtsec=
> +option is not specified,
> +the default behavior depends on the kernel version,
> +but is usually equivalent to
> +.BR "xprtsec=none" .
> .SS "Options for NFS versions 2 and 3 only"
> Use these options, along with the options in the above subsection,
> for NFS versions 2 and 3 only.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-15 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-14 18:36 [PATCH v1] nfs(5): Document the new "xprtsec=" mount option Chuck Lever
2023-07-15 18:07 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2023-07-15 18:53 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-07-15 20:04 ` Steve Dickson
2023-07-17 21:49 ` Steve Dickson
2023-07-30 12:26 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a6e861a1-1609-11fc-219c-88dd8d90b526@redhat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).