From: Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 02/14] xprtrdma: Warn when there are orphaned IB objects
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 13:23:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a943c57dfa28c91f418a07a2904ef852@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150506164817.GC11331@obsidianresearch.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:18 PM
> To: Devesh Sharma
> Cc: Chuck Lever; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; Linux NFS Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/14] xprtrdma: Warn when there are orphaned IB
> objects
>
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 07:52:03PM +0530, Devesh Sharma wrote:
> > >> Should we check for EBUSY explicitly? other then this is an error
> > >> in vendor specific ib_dealloc_pd()
> > >
> > > Any error return means ib_dealloc_pd() has failed, right? Doesn’t
> > > that mean the PD is still allocated, and could cause problems later?
> >
> > Yes, you are correct, I was thinking ib_dealloc_pd() has a refcount
> > implemented in the core layer, thus if the PD is used by any resource,
> > it will always fail with -EBUSY.
>
> .. and it will not be freed, which indicates a serious bug in the caller,
> so the
> caller should respond to the failure with a BUG_ON or WARN_ON.
Yes, that’s what this patch is doing.
>
> > .With emulex adapter it is possible to fail dealloc_pd with ENOMEM or
> > EIO in cases where device f/w is not responding etc. this situation do
> > not represent PD is actually in use.
>
> This is a really bad idea. If the pd was freed and from the consumer's
> perspective everything is sane then it should return success.
>
> If the driver detects an internal failure, then it should move the driver
> to a
> failed state (whatever that means, but at a minimum it means the firmware
> state and driver state must be resync'd), and still succeed the dealloc.
Makes sense.
>
> There is absolutely nothing the caller can do about a driver level failure
> here,
> and it doesn't indicate a caller bug.
>
> Returning ENOMEM for dealloc is what we'd call an insane API. You can't
> have
> failable memory allocations in a dealloc path.
I will supply a fix in ocrdma.
Reviewed-by: Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com>
>
> Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-07 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 17:56 [PATCH v1 00/14] client NFS/RDMA patches for 4.2 Chuck Lever
2015-05-04 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 01/14] xprtrdma: Transport fault injection Chuck Lever
2015-05-05 13:49 ` Anna Schumaker
2015-05-05 13:53 ` Chuck Lever
2015-05-05 14:44 ` Anna Schumaker
2015-05-05 15:15 ` Chuck Lever
2015-05-05 15:16 ` Anna Schumaker
2015-05-05 15:10 ` Steve Wise
2015-05-04 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 02/14] xprtrdma: Warn when there are orphaned IB objects Chuck Lever
2015-05-06 11:37 ` Devesh Sharma
2015-05-06 13:24 ` Chuck Lever
2015-05-06 14:05 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-06 14:22 ` Devesh Sharma
2015-05-06 16:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2015-05-07 7:53 ` Devesh Sharma [this message]
2015-05-04 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 03/14] xprtrdma: Replace rpcrdma_rep::rr_buffer with rr_rxprt Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 9:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-07 13:25 ` Chuck Lever
2015-05-04 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 04/14] xprtrdma: Use ib_device pointer safely Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 10:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-07 13:39 ` Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 13:56 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-07 14:12 ` Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 15:11 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-11 15:22 ` Chuck Lever
2015-05-11 18:26 ` Hefty, Sean
2015-05-11 18:57 ` Chuck Lever
2015-05-12 10:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-04 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 05/14] xprtrdma: Introduce helpers for allocating MWs Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 10:16 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-04 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 06/14] xprtrdma: Acquire FMRs in rpcrdma_fmr_register_external() Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 10:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-04 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 07/14] xprtrdma: Introduce an FRMR recovery workqueue Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 10:37 ` Devesh Sharma
2015-05-04 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 08/14] xprtrdma: Acquire MRs in rpcrdma_register_external() Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 10:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-08 15:24 ` Devesh Sharma
2015-05-08 15:40 ` Chuck Lever
2015-05-10 10:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-04 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 09/14] xprtrdma: Remove unused LOCAL_INV recovery logic Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 10:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-08 15:31 ` Devesh Sharma
2015-05-04 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 10/14] xprtrdma: Remove ->ro_reset Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 10:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-08 15:33 ` Devesh Sharma
2015-05-04 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 11/14] xprtrdma: Remove rpcrdma_ia::ri_memreg_strategy Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 10:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-08 15:34 ` Devesh Sharma
2015-05-04 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 12/14] xprtrdma: Split rb_lock Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 10:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-04 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 13/14] xprtrdma: Stack relief in fmr_op_map() Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 10:50 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-08 15:36 ` Devesh Sharma
2015-05-04 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 14/14] xprtrmda: Reduce per-transport MR allocation Chuck Lever
2015-05-07 11:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-05-08 15:53 ` Devesh Sharma
2015-05-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v1 00/14] client NFS/RDMA patches for 4.2 Steve Wise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a943c57dfa28c91f418a07a2904ef852@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devesh.sharma@avagotech.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).