Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, dw@davidwei.uk,
	brauner@kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] iov_iter: remove iov_iter_is_aligned
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 08:16:39 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJDAx1Ns9Fg7F6iK@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aI1xySNUdQ2B0dbJ@kernel.org>

On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 10:02:49PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 04:47:36PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> > 
> > No more callers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> 
> You had me up until this last patch.
> 
> I'm actually making use of iov_iter_is_aligned() in a series of
> changes for both NFS and NFSD.  Chuck has included some of the
> NFSD changes in his nfsd-testing branch, see:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cel/linux.git/commit/?h=nfsd-testing&id=5d78ac1e674b45f9c9e3769b48efb27c44f4e4d3
> 
> And the balance of my work that is pending review/inclusion is:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20250731230633.89983-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20250801171049.94235-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
> 
> I only need iov_iter_aligned_bvec, but recall I want to relax its
> checking with this patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20250708160619.64800-5-snitzer@kernel.org/
> 
> Should I just add iov_iter_aligned_bvec() to fs/nfs_common/ so that
> both NFS and NFSD can use it?

If at all possible, I recommend finding a place that already walks the
vectors and do an opprotunistic check for the alignments there. This
will save CPU cycles. For example, nfsd_iter_read already iterates the
bvec while setting each page. Could you check the alignment while doing
that instead of iterating a second time immediately after?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-04 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250801234736.1913170-1-kbusch@meta.com>
     [not found] ` <20250801234736.1913170-8-kbusch@meta.com>
2025-08-02  2:02   ` [PATCH 7/7] iov_iter: remove iov_iter_is_aligned Mike Snitzer
2025-08-04 14:16     ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-08-04 15:25       ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-04 15:27         ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-04 22:26         ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-04 22:57           ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aJDAx1Ns9Fg7F6iK@kbusch-mbp \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox